TY - JOUR
T1 - A brief, clinic-based, safer sex intervention for heterosexual African American men newly diagnosed with an STD
T2 - a randomized controlled trial.
AU - Crosby, Richard
AU - DiClemente, Ralph J.
AU - Charnigo, Richard
AU - Snow, Gregory
AU - Troutman, Adewale
PY - 2009/4
Y1 - 2009/4
N2 - OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the efficacy of a brief, clinic-based, safer sex program administered by a lay health adviser for young heterosexual African American men newly diagnosed with a sexually transmitted disease (STD). METHODS: Subsequent to STD diagnosis, eligible men (N = 266; aged 18-29 years) were randomized to either a personalized, single-session intervention (delivered by a lay health adviser) or standard of care. We conducted behavioral assessments at baseline and 3 months postintervention (retention was 74.1%). We also conducted a 6-month clinic record review. RESULTS: Compared to men randomized to the control condition, those receiving the intervention were significantly less likely to acquire subsequent STDs (50.4% vs 31.9%; P = .002) and more likely to report using condoms during last sexual intercourse (72.4% vs 53.9%; P = .008). They also reported fewer sexual partners (mean 2.06 vs 4.15; P < .001) and fewer acts of unprotected sex (mean 12.3 vs 29.4; P = .045). Based on a 9-point rating scale, men in the intervention group had higher proficiency scores for condom application skills (mean difference = 3.17; P < .001). CONCLUSION: A brief clinic-based intervention delivered by a lay health adviser may be an efficacious strategy to reduce incident STDs among young heterosexual African American men.
AB - OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the efficacy of a brief, clinic-based, safer sex program administered by a lay health adviser for young heterosexual African American men newly diagnosed with a sexually transmitted disease (STD). METHODS: Subsequent to STD diagnosis, eligible men (N = 266; aged 18-29 years) were randomized to either a personalized, single-session intervention (delivered by a lay health adviser) or standard of care. We conducted behavioral assessments at baseline and 3 months postintervention (retention was 74.1%). We also conducted a 6-month clinic record review. RESULTS: Compared to men randomized to the control condition, those receiving the intervention were significantly less likely to acquire subsequent STDs (50.4% vs 31.9%; P = .002) and more likely to report using condoms during last sexual intercourse (72.4% vs 53.9%; P = .008). They also reported fewer sexual partners (mean 2.06 vs 4.15; P < .001) and fewer acts of unprotected sex (mean 12.3 vs 29.4; P = .045). Based on a 9-point rating scale, men in the intervention group had higher proficiency scores for condom application skills (mean difference = 3.17; P < .001). CONCLUSION: A brief clinic-based intervention delivered by a lay health adviser may be an efficacious strategy to reduce incident STDs among young heterosexual African American men.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=63849131695&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=63849131695&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.2007.123893
DO - 10.2105/AJPH.2007.123893
M3 - Article
C2 - 19218185
AN - SCOPUS:63849131695
SN - 0090-0036
VL - 99 Suppl 1
SP - S96-103
JO - American journal of public health
JF - American journal of public health
ER -