Abstract
We demonstrate that fixed- and random-effects models for pooled cross-sectional and time series data, and latent growth curve models for panel data are special cases of a more general model. We compare the estimates obtained from each type of model for a data set consisting of homicide rates and a vector of explanatory variables for 400 US counties over a 15-year period. Most, but not all, estimates are similar in the two models. We identify circumstances under which one approach may be advantageous to the other.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 51-72 |
Number of pages | 22 |
Journal | Journal of Quantitative Criminology |
Volume | 24 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 2008 |
Keywords
- Fixed effects models
- Homicide rates
- Latent growth curve models
- Panel data
- Random effects models
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine
- Law