A Comparison of Second-Degree Baccalaureate and Traditional-Baccalaureate New Graduate RNs: Implications for the Workforce

Carol S. Brewer, Christine T. Kovner, Shakthi Poornima, Susan Fairchild, Hongsoo Kim, Maja Djukic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe the differences between traditional-baccalaureate graduates (TBGs) who had a baccalaureate degree in nursing and no other academic degree or diploma and second-degree baccalaureate graduates (SDGs) who had both a baccalaureate degree in nursing and a baccalaureate or higher degree in a field other than nursing. Using a sample of 953 newly licensed registered nurses (NLRNs), we compared SDGs and TBGs on demographic and work characteristics, including attitudes toward work, intent to stay in their current job, and whether they are searching for a job. TBGs worked slightly more hours per week and were more likely to provide direct care. SDGs were more likely to plan to stay indefinitely in their first job and were less uncertain of plans to stay. SDGs experienced higher family-work conflict and lower workgroup cohesion. Full-time SDGs earn over $2,700 more income per year. Potential explanations for the salary difference are the greater human capital that SDGs bring to the job and their older age. Understanding the workforce productivity of these two groups is important for both organizational planning and policy for recruitment and retention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5-14
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Professional Nursing
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2009

Keywords

  • New graduates
  • Newly licensed registered nurses
  • Orientation
  • Retention
  • Satisfaction
  • Second-degree nurses
  • Turnover

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Nursing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Comparison of Second-Degree Baccalaureate and Traditional-Baccalaureate New Graduate RNs: Implications for the Workforce'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this