Abstract
Both the core and the bargaining set fail to satisfy a natural requirement of consistency. In excluding imputations to which there exist objections, the core does not assess the "credibility" of such objections. The bargaining set goes a step further. Only objections which have no counterobjections are considered justified. However, the credibility of counterobjections is not similarly assessed. We formulate a notion of a consistent bargaining set in which each objection in a "chain" of objections is tested in precisely the same way as its predecessor. Various properties of the consistent bargaining set are also analyzed.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 93-112 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Journal | Journal of Economic Theory |
Volume | 49 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Oct 1989 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Economics and Econometrics