A Cross-Cultural Study of Punishment Beliefs and Decisions

Yanyan Zhang, Chuansheng Chen, Ellen Greenberger, Eric D. Knowles

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

Abstract

The current research examined cultural similarities and differences in punishment beliefs and decisions. Participants were European Americans (N = 50), Chinese Americans (N = 57), and Chinese in Mainland China (N = 50). The Functions of Punishment Questionnaire was used to measure participants' beliefs about the retributive or deterrent functions of punishment and a scenario method was used to measure the extent to which punishment decisions were driven by individuals' concerns for retribution or deterrence. The results indicated that, contrary to the hypothesis that the retributive function would be emphasized by individualistic groups and the deterrent function by collectivistic groups, Mainland Chinese participants had a stronger belief in retribution and a weaker belief in deterrence than did European and Chinese Americans. The results also indicated that retribution played a bigger role in punishment decisions for Chinese than for the other two groups, but the importance of the deterrence function in punishment decisions did not differ across the three groups. Finally, the correlation between interdependence orientation and the belief in retribution was positive for Chinese but negative for European Americans. Taken together, the findings provided little evidence that collectivists are more deterrence-oriented and individualists more retribution-oriented.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages5-24
Number of pages20
JournalPsychological Reports
Volume120
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2017

Fingerprint

Punishment
Asian Americans
China
Research
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Crime punishment
  • cross-cultural
  • deterrence
  • functions of punishment
  • retribution

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

A Cross-Cultural Study of Punishment Beliefs and Decisions. / Zhang, Yanyan; Chen, Chuansheng; Greenberger, Ellen; Knowles, Eric D.

In: Psychological Reports, Vol. 120, No. 1, 01.02.2017, p. 5-24.

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

Zhang Y, Chen C, Greenberger E, Knowles ED. A Cross-Cultural Study of Punishment Beliefs and Decisions. Psychological Reports. 2017 Feb 1;120(1):5-24. Available from, DOI: 10.1177/0033294116679654
Zhang, Yanyan ; Chen, Chuansheng ; Greenberger, Ellen ; Knowles, Eric D./ A Cross-Cultural Study of Punishment Beliefs and Decisions. In: Psychological Reports. 2017 ; Vol. 120, No. 1. pp. 5-24
@article{7d42df7549de44ee9b73f2e1084fb557,
title = "A Cross-Cultural Study of Punishment Beliefs and Decisions",
abstract = "The current research examined cultural similarities and differences in punishment beliefs and decisions. Participants were European Americans (N = 50), Chinese Americans (N = 57), and Chinese in Mainland China (N = 50). The Functions of Punishment Questionnaire was used to measure participants' beliefs about the retributive or deterrent functions of punishment and a scenario method was used to measure the extent to which punishment decisions were driven by individuals' concerns for retribution or deterrence. The results indicated that, contrary to the hypothesis that the retributive function would be emphasized by individualistic groups and the deterrent function by collectivistic groups, Mainland Chinese participants had a stronger belief in retribution and a weaker belief in deterrence than did European and Chinese Americans. The results also indicated that retribution played a bigger role in punishment decisions for Chinese than for the other two groups, but the importance of the deterrence function in punishment decisions did not differ across the three groups. Finally, the correlation between interdependence orientation and the belief in retribution was positive for Chinese but negative for European Americans. Taken together, the findings provided little evidence that collectivists are more deterrence-oriented and individualists more retribution-oriented.",
keywords = "Crime punishment, cross-cultural, deterrence, functions of punishment, retribution",
author = "Yanyan Zhang and Chuansheng Chen and Ellen Greenberger and Knowles, {Eric D.}",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1177/0033294116679654",
volume = "120",
pages = "5--24",
journal = "Psychological Reports",
issn = "0033-2941",
publisher = "Ammons Scientific Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Cross-Cultural Study of Punishment Beliefs and Decisions

AU - Zhang,Yanyan

AU - Chen,Chuansheng

AU - Greenberger,Ellen

AU - Knowles,Eric D.

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - The current research examined cultural similarities and differences in punishment beliefs and decisions. Participants were European Americans (N = 50), Chinese Americans (N = 57), and Chinese in Mainland China (N = 50). The Functions of Punishment Questionnaire was used to measure participants' beliefs about the retributive or deterrent functions of punishment and a scenario method was used to measure the extent to which punishment decisions were driven by individuals' concerns for retribution or deterrence. The results indicated that, contrary to the hypothesis that the retributive function would be emphasized by individualistic groups and the deterrent function by collectivistic groups, Mainland Chinese participants had a stronger belief in retribution and a weaker belief in deterrence than did European and Chinese Americans. The results also indicated that retribution played a bigger role in punishment decisions for Chinese than for the other two groups, but the importance of the deterrence function in punishment decisions did not differ across the three groups. Finally, the correlation between interdependence orientation and the belief in retribution was positive for Chinese but negative for European Americans. Taken together, the findings provided little evidence that collectivists are more deterrence-oriented and individualists more retribution-oriented.

AB - The current research examined cultural similarities and differences in punishment beliefs and decisions. Participants were European Americans (N = 50), Chinese Americans (N = 57), and Chinese in Mainland China (N = 50). The Functions of Punishment Questionnaire was used to measure participants' beliefs about the retributive or deterrent functions of punishment and a scenario method was used to measure the extent to which punishment decisions were driven by individuals' concerns for retribution or deterrence. The results indicated that, contrary to the hypothesis that the retributive function would be emphasized by individualistic groups and the deterrent function by collectivistic groups, Mainland Chinese participants had a stronger belief in retribution and a weaker belief in deterrence than did European and Chinese Americans. The results also indicated that retribution played a bigger role in punishment decisions for Chinese than for the other two groups, but the importance of the deterrence function in punishment decisions did not differ across the three groups. Finally, the correlation between interdependence orientation and the belief in retribution was positive for Chinese but negative for European Americans. Taken together, the findings provided little evidence that collectivists are more deterrence-oriented and individualists more retribution-oriented.

KW - Crime punishment

KW - cross-cultural

KW - deterrence

KW - functions of punishment

KW - retribution

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011685003&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011685003&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0033294116679654

DO - 10.1177/0033294116679654

M3 - Article

VL - 120

SP - 5

EP - 24

JO - Psychological Reports

T2 - Psychological Reports

JF - Psychological Reports

SN - 0033-2941

IS - 1

ER -