TY - JOUR
T1 - A Decade of ACOs in Medicare
T2 - Have They Delivered on Their Promise?
AU - Spivack, Steven B.
AU - Murray, Genevra F.
AU - Lewis, Valerie A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Valerie A. Lewis is an associate professor with the Department of Health Policy and Management at the UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health and a fellow with the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research. She is a sociologist and policy researcher with extensive experience researching health care payment and delivery reform, health care organizations, and racial and socioeconomic disparities in outcomes. Her work has been funded by the National Institutes of Health, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the Commonwealth Fund, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and the Donaghue Foundation.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 by Duke University Press.
PY - 2023/2/1
Y1 - 2023/2/1
N2 - Accountable care organizations (ACOs) were envisioned as a way to address both health care cost growth and uneven quality in US health care. They emerged in the early 2000s, with the 2010 Affordable Care Act (ACA) establishing a Medicare ACO program. In the decade since their launch, ACOs have grown into one of Medicare’s flagship payment reform programs, with millions of beneficiaries receiving care from hundreds of ACOs. While great expectations surrounded ACOs’ introduction into Medicare, their impacts to date have been modest. ACOs have achieved some savings and improvements in measured quality, but disagreement persists over the meaning of those results: Do ACOs represent important, incremental steps forward on the path toward a more efficient, high-quality health care system? Or do their modest achievements signal a failure of large-scale progress despite the substantial investments of resources? ACOs have proven to be politically resilient, largely sidestepping the controversies and partisan polarization that have led to the demise of other ACA provisions. But the same features that have enabled ACOs to evade backlash have constrained their impacts and effectiveness. After a decade, ACOs’ long-term influence on Medicare and the US health care system remains uncertain.
AB - Accountable care organizations (ACOs) were envisioned as a way to address both health care cost growth and uneven quality in US health care. They emerged in the early 2000s, with the 2010 Affordable Care Act (ACA) establishing a Medicare ACO program. In the decade since their launch, ACOs have grown into one of Medicare’s flagship payment reform programs, with millions of beneficiaries receiving care from hundreds of ACOs. While great expectations surrounded ACOs’ introduction into Medicare, their impacts to date have been modest. ACOs have achieved some savings and improvements in measured quality, but disagreement persists over the meaning of those results: Do ACOs represent important, incremental steps forward on the path toward a more efficient, high-quality health care system? Or do their modest achievements signal a failure of large-scale progress despite the substantial investments of resources? ACOs have proven to be politically resilient, largely sidestepping the controversies and partisan polarization that have led to the demise of other ACA provisions. But the same features that have enabled ACOs to evade backlash have constrained their impacts and effectiveness. After a decade, ACOs’ long-term influence on Medicare and the US health care system remains uncertain.
KW - Medicare
KW - Medicare Shared Savings Program
KW - accountable care organizations
KW - health care costs
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147046261&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85147046261&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1215/03616878-10171090
DO - 10.1215/03616878-10171090
M3 - Article
C2 - 36112955
AN - SCOPUS:85147046261
SN - 0361-6878
VL - 48
SP - 63
EP - 92
JO - Journal of health politics, policy and law
JF - Journal of health politics, policy and law
IS - 1
ER -