TY - GEN
T1 - A deeper understanding of interoperability between TinyRPL and ContikiRPL
AU - Guan, Lixia
AU - Kuladinithi, Koojana
AU - Potsch, Thomas
AU - Goerg, Carmelita
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - Today, there exist several standards based and proprietary based protocols that can be used in Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) applications. Proprietary technologies are difficult to integrate into larger networks and currently available Internet-based services. The use of IP based technologies allows easy integration with existing network infrastructure. Interoperability has always been a major concern within the IETF. The previous work has proved that the IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-power and Lossy Networks (RPL) protocol, proposed by the IETF is interoperable in widely used TinyOS and Contiki platforms. Compared to the previous work, this work highlights the detailed analysis of the behaviour of RPL in these two platforms, in terms of comparison with two objective functions used (MRHOF and OF0), analysis of RPL control messages (DIO, DIS and DAO) and finally the tolerance of RPL performance under varying traffic loads (1 packets per minute to 60 packets per minute). Further, this work gives a detailed insight into implementation specific issues as reasoning for the degradation of the RPL performance, when mixing nodes of TinyOS and Contiki.
AB - Today, there exist several standards based and proprietary based protocols that can be used in Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) applications. Proprietary technologies are difficult to integrate into larger networks and currently available Internet-based services. The use of IP based technologies allows easy integration with existing network infrastructure. Interoperability has always been a major concern within the IETF. The previous work has proved that the IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-power and Lossy Networks (RPL) protocol, proposed by the IETF is interoperable in widely used TinyOS and Contiki platforms. Compared to the previous work, this work highlights the detailed analysis of the behaviour of RPL in these two platforms, in terms of comparison with two objective functions used (MRHOF and OF0), analysis of RPL control messages (DIO, DIS and DAO) and finally the tolerance of RPL performance under varying traffic loads (1 packets per minute to 60 packets per minute). Further, this work gives a detailed insight into implementation specific issues as reasoning for the degradation of the RPL performance, when mixing nodes of TinyOS and Contiki.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903738226&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84903738226&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ISSNIP.2014.6827680
DO - 10.1109/ISSNIP.2014.6827680
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84903738226
SN - 9781479928439
T3 - IEEE ISSNIP 2014 - 2014 IEEE 9th International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing, Conference Proceedings
BT - IEEE ISSNIP 2014 - 2014 IEEE 9th International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing, Conference Proceedings
PB - IEEE Computer Society
T2 - 9th IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing, IEEE ISSNIP 2014
Y2 - 21 April 2014 through 24 April 2014
ER -