TY - JOUR
T1 - A dynamic recontracting process for multiple-type housing markets
AU - Klaus, Bettina
AU - Bochet, Olivier
AU - Walzl, Markus
N1 - Funding Information:
We are grateful to Juan D. Moreno-Ternero, William Thomson, and two anonymous referees for their useful comments. Bettina Klaus thanks the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) for its support under grant VIDI-452-06-013. Olivier Bochet thanks, respectively, the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) and the Swiss Science Foundation (SNF) for their support under grant VENI-451-07-021 and grant 100014 126954.
PY - 2011/1/20
Y1 - 2011/1/20
N2 - We consider multiple-type housing markets. To capture the dynamic aspect of trade in such markets, we study a dynamic recontracting process similar to the one introduced by Serrano and Volij (2008). First, we analyze the set of recurrent classes of this process as a (non-empty) solution concept. We show that each core allocation always constitutes a singleton recurrent class and provide examples of non-singleton recurrent classes consisting of blocking-cycles of individually rational allocations. For multiple-type housing markets stochastic stability never serves as a selection device among recurrent classes. Next, we propose a method to compute the limit invariant distribution of the dynamic recontracting process. Furthermore, we discuss how the limit invariant distribution is influenced by the relative coalitional stability and accessibility of the different stochastically stable allocations. We illustrate our findings with several examples. In particular, we demonstrate that some core allocations are less likely to be final allocations of the dynamic process than cycles composed of non-core allocations.
AB - We consider multiple-type housing markets. To capture the dynamic aspect of trade in such markets, we study a dynamic recontracting process similar to the one introduced by Serrano and Volij (2008). First, we analyze the set of recurrent classes of this process as a (non-empty) solution concept. We show that each core allocation always constitutes a singleton recurrent class and provide examples of non-singleton recurrent classes consisting of blocking-cycles of individually rational allocations. For multiple-type housing markets stochastic stability never serves as a selection device among recurrent classes. Next, we propose a method to compute the limit invariant distribution of the dynamic recontracting process. Furthermore, we discuss how the limit invariant distribution is influenced by the relative coalitional stability and accessibility of the different stochastically stable allocations. We illustrate our findings with several examples. In particular, we demonstrate that some core allocations are less likely to be final allocations of the dynamic process than cycles composed of non-core allocations.
KW - Core
KW - Indivisible goods
KW - Limit invariant distribution
KW - Stochastic stability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952699063&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952699063&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jmateco.2010.08.014
DO - 10.1016/j.jmateco.2010.08.014
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:79952699063
SN - 0304-4068
VL - 47
SP - 84
EP - 98
JO - Journal of Mathematical Economics
JF - Journal of Mathematical Economics
IS - 1
ER -