Abstract
In the first competitive election for President of the Social Choice and Welfare Society, the (official) approval-voting winner differed from the (hypothetical) Borda count winner, who was also the Condorcet winner. But because the election was essentially a toss-up, it is impossible to say who should have won. The election for Council was more true to form of other professional-society elections, with the winners identical, and even their rankings almost duplicative, under both voting systems.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 409-414 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Social Choice and Welfare |
Volume | 18 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2001 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
- Economics and Econometrics