TY - JOUR
T1 - A New Perspective on Stress Detection
T2 - An Automated Approach for Detecting Eustress and Distress
AU - Awada, Mohamad
AU - Becerik-Gerber, Burcin
AU - Lucas, Gale
AU - Roll, Shawn
AU - Liu, Ruying
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2010-2012 IEEE.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Previous studies have solely focused on establishing Machine Learning (ML) models for automated detection of stress arousal. However, these studies do not recognize stress appraisal and presume stress is a negative mental state. Yet, stress can be classified according to its influence on individuals; the way people perceive a stressor determines whether the stress reaction is considered as eustress (positive stress) or distress (negative stress). Thus, this study aims to assess the potential of using an ML approach to determine stress appraisal and identify eustress and distress instances using physiological and behavioral features. The results indicate that distress leads to higher perceived stress arousal compared to eustress. An XGBoost model that combined physiological and behavioral features using a 30 second time window had 83.38% and 78.79% F1-scores for predicting eustress and distress, respectively. Gender-based models resulted in an average increase of 2-4% in eustress and distress prediction accuracy. Finally, a model to predict the simultaneous assessment of eustress and distress, distinguishing between pure eustress, pure distress, eustress-distress coexistence, and the absence of stress achieved a moderate F1-score of 65.12%. The results of this study lay the foundation for work management interventions to maximize eustress and minimize distress in the workplace.
AB - Previous studies have solely focused on establishing Machine Learning (ML) models for automated detection of stress arousal. However, these studies do not recognize stress appraisal and presume stress is a negative mental state. Yet, stress can be classified according to its influence on individuals; the way people perceive a stressor determines whether the stress reaction is considered as eustress (positive stress) or distress (negative stress). Thus, this study aims to assess the potential of using an ML approach to determine stress appraisal and identify eustress and distress instances using physiological and behavioral features. The results indicate that distress leads to higher perceived stress arousal compared to eustress. An XGBoost model that combined physiological and behavioral features using a 30 second time window had 83.38% and 78.79% F1-scores for predicting eustress and distress, respectively. Gender-based models resulted in an average increase of 2-4% in eustress and distress prediction accuracy. Finally, a model to predict the simultaneous assessment of eustress and distress, distinguishing between pure eustress, pure distress, eustress-distress coexistence, and the absence of stress achieved a moderate F1-score of 65.12%. The results of this study lay the foundation for work management interventions to maximize eustress and minimize distress in the workplace.
KW - Psychological stress
KW - behavioral data
KW - machine learning
KW - physiological data
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85174803569&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85174803569&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TAFFC.2023.3324910
DO - 10.1109/TAFFC.2023.3324910
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85174803569
SN - 1949-3045
VL - 15
SP - 1153
EP - 1165
JO - IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing
JF - IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing
IS - 3
ER -