A novel method for evaluating and comparing community health reports

Cynthia J. Hines, Mieka Smart, Nailya Delellis, F. Remington Sprague, Debra Furr-Holden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Objectives: This study assessed the comprehensiveness and efficiency of existing Flint area public health community data using a novel method. One hundred thirty-eight community public health data reports were identified and screened for inclusion from Internet searches and community partner interviews. Methods: Forty-two Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-based health metrics were adopted as a standard for unbiased comparison. For each report, a percentage “match-to-standard” was calculated (i.e., we calculated the percentage of CDC recommended metrics that were covered in the report). The two locally generated reports with the highest match-to-standard scores were compared for overlap. Results: There were 138 initially identified reports, and 110 unique reports remained after duplicates were removed. Twenty public health data reports met inclusion criteria and were included in the final sample. The top local public health data report yielded a 59.5% match-to-standard, indicating a 23.8% gap in current Flint area community data. Evaluation across all reports yielded an 89.3% match-to-standard with a 10.7% gap. An overlap of 70% exists between the two local reports with the highest match-to-standard scores. Conclusions: This research identified key health metrics not captured by current locally generated Flint public health reports. The 23.8% gap indicates an opportunity to improve local public health data report comprehensiveness. The 70% overlap across the two local reports with greatest match-tostandard scores generated locally, indicates potential duplication and an opportunity to improve efficiency.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)307-313
Number of pages7
JournalProgress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action
Issue number3
StatePublished - Sep 1 2020


  • Community health
  • Community reports
  • Disease prevention
  • Health metrics
  • Health promotion
  • Needs assessments
  • Population health
  • Public health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science


Dive into the research topics of 'A novel method for evaluating and comparing community health reports'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this