TY - JOUR
T1 - A novel semi-supervised method for airborne LiDAR point cloud classification
AU - Li, Xiang
AU - Wen, Congcong
AU - Cao, Qiming
AU - Du, Yanlei
AU - Fang, Yi
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank NYUAD Institute (AD131) for providing financial support for this work. The authors thank German Society for Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing, and Geoinformation (DGPF) (http://www.ifp.uni-stuttgart.de/dgpf/DKEP-Allg.html) for providing the Vaihingen 3D dataset (Cramer, 2010). The authors also thank the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory and IARPA for providing the data used in this study, and the IEEE GRSS Image Analysis and Data Fusion Technical Committee for organizing the Data Fusion Contest (http://www.grss-ieee.org/community/technical-committees/data-fusion).
Funding Information:
We thank NYUAD Institute (AD131) for providing financial support for this work. The authors thank German Society for Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing, and Geoinformation (DGPF) ( http://www.ifp.uni-stuttgart.de/dgpf/DKEP-Allg.html ) for providing the Vaihingen 3D dataset ( Cramer, 2010 ). The authors also thank the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory and IARPA for providing the data used in this study, and the IEEE GRSS Image Analysis and Data Fusion Technical Committee for organizing the Data Fusion Contest ( http://www.grss-ieee.org/community/technical-committees/data-fusion ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Inc. (ISPRS)
PY - 2021/10
Y1 - 2021/10
N2 - Existing supervised-learning-based methods have achieved remarkable performance for Airborne LiDAR point cloud classification with the help of large-scale human-annotated datasets. However, human annotations are usually labor-intensive and time-consuming, especially for dense segmentation labels, and an inadequate dataset may lead to poor generalization ability of the learned models. In this paper, to relieve the need for large-scale dense annotations, we introduce a semi-supervised method for airborne LiDAR point cloud classification which requires only a small fraction of points to be labeled during model training. To achieve this goal, we introduce a masked supervision module that provides supervision signals from only a few labeled points. Then, three unsupervised supervision modules are introduced to encourage global context consistency, transformation consistency, and spatial smoothness of the learned features. Experiments are conducted on the two benchmark datasets and the results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method for semi-supervised airborne LiDAR point cloud classification. Specifically, the proposed methods can obtain a classification performance comparable to its fully supervised counterpart with only 10% and 1% labeled points for ISPRS 3D Labeling Vaihingen dataset and 2019 IEEE GRSS Data Fusion Contest 3D Point Cloud Classification dataset respectively.
AB - Existing supervised-learning-based methods have achieved remarkable performance for Airborne LiDAR point cloud classification with the help of large-scale human-annotated datasets. However, human annotations are usually labor-intensive and time-consuming, especially for dense segmentation labels, and an inadequate dataset may lead to poor generalization ability of the learned models. In this paper, to relieve the need for large-scale dense annotations, we introduce a semi-supervised method for airborne LiDAR point cloud classification which requires only a small fraction of points to be labeled during model training. To achieve this goal, we introduce a masked supervision module that provides supervision signals from only a few labeled points. Then, three unsupervised supervision modules are introduced to encourage global context consistency, transformation consistency, and spatial smoothness of the learned features. Experiments are conducted on the two benchmark datasets and the results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method for semi-supervised airborne LiDAR point cloud classification. Specifically, the proposed methods can obtain a classification performance comparable to its fully supervised counterpart with only 10% and 1% labeled points for ISPRS 3D Labeling Vaihingen dataset and 2019 IEEE GRSS Data Fusion Contest 3D Point Cloud Classification dataset respectively.
KW - Airborne LiDAR
KW - Point cloud classification
KW - Semi-supervised classification
KW - Siamese self-supervision
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85113377184&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85113377184&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2021.08.010
DO - 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2021.08.010
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85113377184
SN - 0924-2716
VL - 180
SP - 117
EP - 129
JO - ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
JF - ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
ER -