TY - JOUR
T1 - A physical model links structure and function in the plant immune system
AU - Weiner, Benjamin G.
AU - Märkle, Hanna
AU - Laderman, Eric
AU - Demirjian, Choghag
AU - Bergelson, Joy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2025 the Author(s).
PY - 2025/6/17
Y1 - 2025/6/17
N2 - Effector-Triggered Immunity (ETI) is an important part of the plant immune system, allowing plants to sense and respond to harmful pathogen proteins known as “effectors.” Effectors can be sensed directly or indirectly by NLR (Nucleotide-binding Leucine-rich Repeat) proteins, many of which “guard” the plant proteins targeted by effectors. Although a few effector–target–NLR interactions have been characterized, a general understanding of how these molecular interactions give rise to a functioning immune system is lacking. Here, we present a physics-based model of ETI based on protein–protein interactions. We show that the simplest physical model consistent with the biology gives rise to a robust immune sensor and explains the empirical phenomenon of effector interference as a generic consequence of molecules competing for binding partners. Using the evolutionarily conserved ZAR1 defense gene as a model, we explain how more complex interaction networks integrate multiple pathogen signals into a single response. We then examine alternatives to a guarding architecture, including direct sensing, decoys, and blended “integrated decoy” strategies, and reveal that these sensing architectures obey functional trade-offs between their sensitivity, target protection, and proteomic cost. This allows a quantitative analysis of the tradeoffs between different forms of ETI. We discuss these findings in the context of the evolutionary forces shaping the plant immune system.
AB - Effector-Triggered Immunity (ETI) is an important part of the plant immune system, allowing plants to sense and respond to harmful pathogen proteins known as “effectors.” Effectors can be sensed directly or indirectly by NLR (Nucleotide-binding Leucine-rich Repeat) proteins, many of which “guard” the plant proteins targeted by effectors. Although a few effector–target–NLR interactions have been characterized, a general understanding of how these molecular interactions give rise to a functioning immune system is lacking. Here, we present a physics-based model of ETI based on protein–protein interactions. We show that the simplest physical model consistent with the biology gives rise to a robust immune sensor and explains the empirical phenomenon of effector interference as a generic consequence of molecules competing for binding partners. Using the evolutionarily conserved ZAR1 defense gene as a model, we explain how more complex interaction networks integrate multiple pathogen signals into a single response. We then examine alternatives to a guarding architecture, including direct sensing, decoys, and blended “integrated decoy” strategies, and reveal that these sensing architectures obey functional trade-offs between their sensitivity, target protection, and proteomic cost. This allows a quantitative analysis of the tradeoffs between different forms of ETI. We discuss these findings in the context of the evolutionary forces shaping the plant immune system.
KW - ETI
KW - NLR
KW - physics-based model
KW - plant immune system
KW - protein–protein interactions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105008394962&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105008394962&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1073/pnas.2502872122
DO - 10.1073/pnas.2502872122
M3 - Article
C2 - 40493200
AN - SCOPUS:105008394962
SN - 0027-8424
VL - 122
JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
IS - 24
M1 - e2502872122
ER -