TY - JOUR
T1 - A remark on color-blind affirmative action
AU - Ray, Debraj
AU - Sethi, Rajiv
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2010/6
Y1 - 2010/6
N2 - Faced with legal challenges to explicitly race-contingent admissions policies, elite educational institutions have turned to criteria that meet diversity goals without being formally contingent on applicant identity. We establish that under weak conditions that apply generically, such color-blind affirmative action policies must be nonmonotone, in the sense that within each social group, some students with lower scores are admitted while others with higher scores are denied. In addition, we argue that blind rules can generate greater disparities in mean scores across groups conditional on acceptance than would arise if explicitly race-contingent policies were permitted.
AB - Faced with legal challenges to explicitly race-contingent admissions policies, elite educational institutions have turned to criteria that meet diversity goals without being formally contingent on applicant identity. We establish that under weak conditions that apply generically, such color-blind affirmative action policies must be nonmonotone, in the sense that within each social group, some students with lower scores are admitted while others with higher scores are denied. In addition, we argue that blind rules can generate greater disparities in mean scores across groups conditional on acceptance than would arise if explicitly race-contingent policies were permitted.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953998168&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953998168&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9779.2010.01458.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9779.2010.01458.x
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:77953998168
VL - 12
SP - 399
EP - 406
JO - Journal of Public Economic Theory
JF - Journal of Public Economic Theory
SN - 1467-9779
IS - 3
ER -