A Research Note on Unconditional Cash Transfers and Fertility in the United States: New Causal Evidence

Molly A. Costanzo, Katherine A. Magnuson, Greg J. Duncan, Nathan Fox, Lisa A. Gennetian, Sarah Halpern-Meekin, Kimberly G. Noble, Hirokazu Yoshikawa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

As cash transfer policies have gained traction in recent years, interest in how financial resources could impact fertility has also grown. Increasing an individ-ual’s purchasing power with additional economic resources, such as those provided in unconditional cash transfers, might better enable parents to meet their fertility and reproductive goals, whether those goals are to become pregnant and give birth or to avoid or terminate pregnancies. In this research note, we provide new experimental evidence of the causal impact of a monthly unconditional cash transfer on fertility-related outcomes for U.S. families with at least one young child and low incomes. We find trends of increased pregnancy after three years but no corresponding impacts on births, miscarriages, or terminations. Our findings might indicate that modest cash transfers to mothers with low incomes in the United States are unlikely to have sub-stan tial impacts on fertility.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)405-417
Number of pages13
JournalDemography
Volume62
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2025

Keywords

  • Cash transfers
  • Fertility
  • Poverty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Demography

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Research Note on Unconditional Cash Transfers and Fertility in the United States: New Causal Evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this