A Simulation Sandbox to Compare Fixed-Route, Semi-flexible Transit, and On-demand Microtransit System Designs

Gyugeun Yoon, Joseph Y.J. Chow, Srushti Rath

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

With advances in emerging technologies, options for operating public transit services have broadened from conventional fixed-route service through semi-flexible service to on-demand microtransit. Nevertheless, guidelines for deciding between these services remain limited in the real implementation. An open-source simulation sandbox is developed that can compare state-of-the-practice methods for evaluating between the different types of public transit operations. For the case of the semi-flexible service, the Mobility Allowance Shuttle Transit (MAST) system is extended to include passenger deviations. A case study demonstrates the sandbox to evaluate and existing B63 bus route in Brooklyn, NY and compares its performance with the four other system designs spanning across the three service types for three different demand scenarios.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3043-3062
Number of pages20
JournalKSCE Journal of Civil Engineering
Volume26
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2022

Keywords

  • Mobility-as-a-Service
  • On-demand microtransit
  • Public transport
  • Semi-flexible transit

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Simulation Sandbox to Compare Fixed-Route, Semi-flexible Transit, and On-demand Microtransit System Designs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this