TY - GEN
T1 - Accessibility barriers to online education for young adults with intellectual disabilities
AU - Buehler, Erin
AU - Easley, William
AU - Poole, Amy
AU - Hurst, Amy
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank the student participants in this program. This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. IIS-1451661. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 ACM.
Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/4/11
Y1 - 2016/4/11
N2 - In postsecondary education, technology and online resources have become a pervasive component of learning, but they are not always accessible. For students with intellectual disabilities, completing technology-dependent tasks may pose unique challenges that are not always addressed by the disability support services offered at the university level. During our fieldwork, we have observed several barriers to online education tools in a postsecondary environment for students with intellectual disabilities. For example, a student with an intellectual disability submitting an assignment via email to an instructor may encounter difficulties recalling and navigating to the location of their attachment file. In this paper, we describe core skills and common interfaces that we have identified as problematic for this population through an emic ethnography. We offer emic (perceptions from within a given environment) experience accounts to highlight the obstacles we have observed in a) information retrieval, b) navigation and information architecture c) file management, and d) password management. As researchers and educators involved in a postsecondary program for young adults with intellectual disability (ID), we have spent considerable time working with this population. For each scenario, we offer examples from our own experience of the techniques and technologies that did or did not help students accomplish these tasks. Based on these experiences, we provide recommendations for mitigating these barriers including education and training for students and developers and the use of existing interventions and tools. We also discuss future directions for this work. We believe that heightened awareness and communication between educators, designers, and students with disabilities will help address these problems and generate solutions which provide more accessible education experiences for learners with diverse needs.
AB - In postsecondary education, technology and online resources have become a pervasive component of learning, but they are not always accessible. For students with intellectual disabilities, completing technology-dependent tasks may pose unique challenges that are not always addressed by the disability support services offered at the university level. During our fieldwork, we have observed several barriers to online education tools in a postsecondary environment for students with intellectual disabilities. For example, a student with an intellectual disability submitting an assignment via email to an instructor may encounter difficulties recalling and navigating to the location of their attachment file. In this paper, we describe core skills and common interfaces that we have identified as problematic for this population through an emic ethnography. We offer emic (perceptions from within a given environment) experience accounts to highlight the obstacles we have observed in a) information retrieval, b) navigation and information architecture c) file management, and d) password management. As researchers and educators involved in a postsecondary program for young adults with intellectual disability (ID), we have spent considerable time working with this population. For each scenario, we offer examples from our own experience of the techniques and technologies that did or did not help students accomplish these tasks. Based on these experiences, we provide recommendations for mitigating these barriers including education and training for students and developers and the use of existing interventions and tools. We also discuss future directions for this work. We believe that heightened awareness and communication between educators, designers, and students with disabilities will help address these problems and generate solutions which provide more accessible education experiences for learners with diverse needs.
KW - Cognitive impairment
KW - Education
KW - Intellectual disability
KW - Online education
KW - Postsecondary education
KW - Web accessibility
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983508908&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84983508908&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/2899475.2899481
DO - 10.1145/2899475.2899481
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84983508908
T3 - W4A 2016 - 13th Web for All Conference
BT - W4A 2016 - 13th Web for All Conference
PB - Association for Computing Machinery, Inc
T2 - 13th Web for All Conference, W4A 2016
Y2 - 11 April 2016 through 13 April 2016
ER -