Accounting for Extra-Dyadic Sources of International Outcomes

Muhammet Bas, Omer F. Orsun, Robert J. Schub

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

Leaders consider the broader international landscape when making foreign policy choices. This landscape could encompass a single external actor, the local region, or even the whole international system. Quantitative analyses of international outcomes, however, frequently do not account for this broader context. This study suggests a corrective, illustrating the value of incorporating extra-dyadic variables into analyses with dyadic and monadic outcomes. The challenge is to parsimoniously capture theoretically salient elements of the multilateral environment. We contend that a measure that links distributions of power within any k-set of relevant states to uncertainty over conflict outcomes is a promising option for two reasons. First, the measure builds from and accords with canonical theories of international politics. Second, it offers scholars a simple and flexible means to define and account for the set of states that constitute the relevant multilateral landscape. Illustrative applications linking power distributions and outcome uncertainty to alliance formation and pursuit of nuclear weapons demonstrate that extra-dyadic factors consistently influence foreign policy outcomes. This study thus shows that situating such outcomes within their broader context is both feasible and substantively important. Moreover, it contributes to recent efforts to address shortcomings of monadic and dyadic studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)777-800
Number of pages24
JournalInternational Interactions
Volume44
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 4 2018

Fingerprint

foreign policy
uncertainty
distribution of power
International Politics
nuclear weapon
international system
leader

Keywords

  • Alliance formation
  • dyadic designs
  • level of analysis
  • nuclear proliferation
  • uncertainty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Accounting for Extra-Dyadic Sources of International Outcomes. / Bas, Muhammet; Orsun, Omer F.; Schub, Robert J.

In: International Interactions, Vol. 44, No. 4, 04.07.2018, p. 777-800.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Bas, Muhammet ; Orsun, Omer F. ; Schub, Robert J. / Accounting for Extra-Dyadic Sources of International Outcomes. In: International Interactions. 2018 ; Vol. 44, No. 4. pp. 777-800.
@article{c76d35fae22e4e479e8c4deea531a04e,
title = "Accounting for Extra-Dyadic Sources of International Outcomes",
abstract = "Leaders consider the broader international landscape when making foreign policy choices. This landscape could encompass a single external actor, the local region, or even the whole international system. Quantitative analyses of international outcomes, however, frequently do not account for this broader context. This study suggests a corrective, illustrating the value of incorporating extra-dyadic variables into analyses with dyadic and monadic outcomes. The challenge is to parsimoniously capture theoretically salient elements of the multilateral environment. We contend that a measure that links distributions of power within any k-set of relevant states to uncertainty over conflict outcomes is a promising option for two reasons. First, the measure builds from and accords with canonical theories of international politics. Second, it offers scholars a simple and flexible means to define and account for the set of states that constitute the relevant multilateral landscape. Illustrative applications linking power distributions and outcome uncertainty to alliance formation and pursuit of nuclear weapons demonstrate that extra-dyadic factors consistently influence foreign policy outcomes. This study thus shows that situating such outcomes within their broader context is both feasible and substantively important. Moreover, it contributes to recent efforts to address shortcomings of monadic and dyadic studies.",
keywords = "Alliance formation, dyadic designs, level of analysis, nuclear proliferation, uncertainty",
author = "Muhammet Bas and Orsun, {Omer F.} and Schub, {Robert J.}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/03050629.2017.1414810",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "777--800",
journal = "International Interactions",
issn = "0305-0629",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accounting for Extra-Dyadic Sources of International Outcomes

AU - Bas, Muhammet

AU - Orsun, Omer F.

AU - Schub, Robert J.

PY - 2018/7/4

Y1 - 2018/7/4

N2 - Leaders consider the broader international landscape when making foreign policy choices. This landscape could encompass a single external actor, the local region, or even the whole international system. Quantitative analyses of international outcomes, however, frequently do not account for this broader context. This study suggests a corrective, illustrating the value of incorporating extra-dyadic variables into analyses with dyadic and monadic outcomes. The challenge is to parsimoniously capture theoretically salient elements of the multilateral environment. We contend that a measure that links distributions of power within any k-set of relevant states to uncertainty over conflict outcomes is a promising option for two reasons. First, the measure builds from and accords with canonical theories of international politics. Second, it offers scholars a simple and flexible means to define and account for the set of states that constitute the relevant multilateral landscape. Illustrative applications linking power distributions and outcome uncertainty to alliance formation and pursuit of nuclear weapons demonstrate that extra-dyadic factors consistently influence foreign policy outcomes. This study thus shows that situating such outcomes within their broader context is both feasible and substantively important. Moreover, it contributes to recent efforts to address shortcomings of monadic and dyadic studies.

AB - Leaders consider the broader international landscape when making foreign policy choices. This landscape could encompass a single external actor, the local region, or even the whole international system. Quantitative analyses of international outcomes, however, frequently do not account for this broader context. This study suggests a corrective, illustrating the value of incorporating extra-dyadic variables into analyses with dyadic and monadic outcomes. The challenge is to parsimoniously capture theoretically salient elements of the multilateral environment. We contend that a measure that links distributions of power within any k-set of relevant states to uncertainty over conflict outcomes is a promising option for two reasons. First, the measure builds from and accords with canonical theories of international politics. Second, it offers scholars a simple and flexible means to define and account for the set of states that constitute the relevant multilateral landscape. Illustrative applications linking power distributions and outcome uncertainty to alliance formation and pursuit of nuclear weapons demonstrate that extra-dyadic factors consistently influence foreign policy outcomes. This study thus shows that situating such outcomes within their broader context is both feasible and substantively important. Moreover, it contributes to recent efforts to address shortcomings of monadic and dyadic studies.

KW - Alliance formation

KW - dyadic designs

KW - level of analysis

KW - nuclear proliferation

KW - uncertainty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85039160737&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85039160737&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/03050629.2017.1414810

DO - 10.1080/03050629.2017.1414810

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 44

SP - 777

EP - 800

JO - International Interactions

JF - International Interactions

SN - 0305-0629

IS - 4

ER -