TY - JOUR
T1 - Active firms and active shareholders
T2 - Corporate political activity and shareholder proposals
AU - Min, Geeyoung
AU - You, Hye Young
N1 - Funding Information:
We are grateful to Jonathan Ashley, Joshua Clinton, Michael Gilbert, Eric Helland, John Matsusaka, Abraham Wickelgren, Daniel Wolfenzon, and participants at the 2015 American Law and Economics Association annual meeting, the 2015 Conference on Empirical Legal Studies, the Political Economy Seminar Series at Northwestern University, and the Law, Business, and Economics Workshop at University of Texas for their helpful comments and suggestions. Special thanks to William Hubbard and an anonymous referee for their thorough comments and feedback.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/1/1
Y1 - 2019/1/1
N2 - This article reveals the positions of corporations not only as active players in politics but also as targets of activist shareholders with opposing political preferences. We examine whether a firm’s political orientation, as measured by its political spending, serves as a driver of shareholder proposal submissions, one manifestation of shareholder activism. Using data on S&P 500 companies for 1997–2014, we find that the divergence in political orientation between shareholders and corporate management is strongly associated with the number of submissions of shareholder proposals on environmental or social issues. Firms that contribute more to the Republican Party are more likely to be targeted by nonindividual, Democratic-leaning shareholders. This pattern remains even after controlling for firms’ records of corporate social responsibility and labor relations. This finding implies that corporate political spending prompts shareholders with strong political preferences to target firms on the opposite end of the political spectrum.
AB - This article reveals the positions of corporations not only as active players in politics but also as targets of activist shareholders with opposing political preferences. We examine whether a firm’s political orientation, as measured by its political spending, serves as a driver of shareholder proposal submissions, one manifestation of shareholder activism. Using data on S&P 500 companies for 1997–2014, we find that the divergence in political orientation between shareholders and corporate management is strongly associated with the number of submissions of shareholder proposals on environmental or social issues. Firms that contribute more to the Republican Party are more likely to be targeted by nonindividual, Democratic-leaning shareholders. This pattern remains even after controlling for firms’ records of corporate social responsibility and labor relations. This finding implies that corporate political spending prompts shareholders with strong political preferences to target firms on the opposite end of the political spectrum.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074567224&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074567224&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1086/700846
DO - 10.1086/700846
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85074567224
SN - 0047-2530
VL - 48
SP - 81
EP - 116
JO - Journal of Legal Studies
JF - Journal of Legal Studies
IS - 1
ER -