Administrative Burden and Procedural Denials: Experimental Evidence from SNAP†

Eric Giannella, Tatiana Homonoff, Gwen Rino, Jason Somerville

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Many government program applications result in procedural denials due to administrative burdens associated with applying. We identify the intake interview as a key barrier to take-up of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and study the effect of an alternative application process designed to reduce burdens. Using a field experiment involving 65,000 Los Angeles applicants, we find that access to flexible interviews initiated by the applicant increases approvals by 6 percentage points, doubles early approvals, and increases long- term participation by over 2 percentage points. Our findings highlight the importance of incorporating flexibility when designing program integrity policies to minimize procedural denials. (JEL H75, I18, I38).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)316-340
Number of pages25
JournalAmerican Economic Journal: Economic Policy
Volume16
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Administrative Burden and Procedural Denials: Experimental Evidence from SNAP†'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this