TY - JOUR
T1 - Affect as a mediator of attributional egotism
AU - Stephan, Walter G.
AU - Gollwitzer, Peter M.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was funded in part by a grant from New Mexico State University and in part by National Institute of Mental Health Grant 32066-01 to Janet Spence and Robert L. Helmreich. The authors would like to thank Sabrina Wise. Debby Pole. and Sara Crain for serving as the experimenters. We also wish to thank Richard Archer. William Bernstein. Janet Spence. and Cookie Stephan for comments on an earlier draft of this article. Portions of this article were presented at the 1979 annual meeting of the APA. Requests for reprints should be sent to Walter G. Stephan, Department of Psychology. Box 3452. New Mexico State University, Las Cruces. NM 88003.
PY - 1981/9
Y1 - 1981/9
N2 - A three-stage model of the relationships among achievement outcomes, outcome-related affect, attribution, and emotion is tested in two studies. It is suggested that success and failure elicit positive and negative affective states due to prior conditioning. These affective states then lead to an attribution process that serves to defend and enhance self-esteem. Next, emotional labels are chosen that are consistent with the affective states and the attributions. Two studies were designed to test the proposed relationships among achievement outcomes, affective states, and attributions. In the first study, subjects received information indicating that they were strongly or mildly aroused as a result of receiving outcome feedback on an achievement task. The results indicated that low arousal reduced egotistical attributions to internal factors. In the second study, subjects either succeeded or failed on an achievement task. Half of the subjects were provided with an opportunity to misattribute the arousal elicited by their outcomes to an irrelevant source. Subjects in the misattribution condition made less egotistical attributions to external factors than subjects who were given no opportunity to misattribute their arousal. The results of both studies suggest that outcome-related affect mediates the relationship between outcomes and attributions in achievement situations.
AB - A three-stage model of the relationships among achievement outcomes, outcome-related affect, attribution, and emotion is tested in two studies. It is suggested that success and failure elicit positive and negative affective states due to prior conditioning. These affective states then lead to an attribution process that serves to defend and enhance self-esteem. Next, emotional labels are chosen that are consistent with the affective states and the attributions. Two studies were designed to test the proposed relationships among achievement outcomes, affective states, and attributions. In the first study, subjects received information indicating that they were strongly or mildly aroused as a result of receiving outcome feedback on an achievement task. The results indicated that low arousal reduced egotistical attributions to internal factors. In the second study, subjects either succeeded or failed on an achievement task. Half of the subjects were provided with an opportunity to misattribute the arousal elicited by their outcomes to an irrelevant source. Subjects in the misattribution condition made less egotistical attributions to external factors than subjects who were given no opportunity to misattribute their arousal. The results of both studies suggest that outcome-related affect mediates the relationship between outcomes and attributions in achievement situations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000855460&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000855460&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0022-1031(81)90033-0
DO - 10.1016/0022-1031(81)90033-0
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0000855460
SN - 0022-1031
VL - 17
SP - 443
EP - 458
JO - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
JF - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
IS - 5
ER -