TY - JOUR
T1 - Affective flexibility
T2 - Evaluative processing goals shape amygdala activity: Research article
AU - Cunningham, William A.
AU - Van Bavel, Jay J.
AU - Johnsen, Ingrid R.
PY - 2008/2
Y1 - 2008/2
N2 - Although early research implicated the amygdala in automatic processing of negative information, more recent research suggests that it plays a more general role in processing the motivational relevance of various stimuli, suggesting that the relation between valence and amygdala activation may depend on contextual goals. This study provides experimental evidence that the relation between valence and amygdala activity is dynamically modulated by evaluative goals. During functional magnetic resonance imaging, participants evaluated the positive, negative, or overall (positive plus negative) aspects of famous people. When participants were providing overall evaluations, both positive and negative names were associated with amygdala activation. When they were evaluating positivity, positive names were associated with amygdala activity, and when they were evaluating negativity, negative names were associated with amygdala activity. Evidence for a negativity bias was found; modulation was more pronounced for positive than for negative information. These data suggest that the amygdala flexibly processes motivationally relevant evaluative information in accordance with current processing goals, but processes negative information less flexibly than positive information.
AB - Although early research implicated the amygdala in automatic processing of negative information, more recent research suggests that it plays a more general role in processing the motivational relevance of various stimuli, suggesting that the relation between valence and amygdala activation may depend on contextual goals. This study provides experimental evidence that the relation between valence and amygdala activity is dynamically modulated by evaluative goals. During functional magnetic resonance imaging, participants evaluated the positive, negative, or overall (positive plus negative) aspects of famous people. When participants were providing overall evaluations, both positive and negative names were associated with amygdala activation. When they were evaluating positivity, positive names were associated with amygdala activity, and when they were evaluating negativity, negative names were associated with amygdala activity. Evidence for a negativity bias was found; modulation was more pronounced for positive than for negative information. These data suggest that the amygdala flexibly processes motivationally relevant evaluative information in accordance with current processing goals, but processes negative information less flexibly than positive information.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38949167516&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38949167516&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02061.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02061.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 18271863
AN - SCOPUS:38949167516
SN - 0956-7976
VL - 19
SP - 152
EP - 160
JO - Psychological Science
JF - Psychological Science
IS - 2
ER -