Age-dependent biologic response to orthodontic forces

Mani Alikhani, Michelle Y. Chou, Edmund Khoo, Sarah Alansari, Rachel Kwal, Tali Elfersi, Abdullah Almansour, Chinapa Sangsuwon, Mohammed Al Jearah, Jeanne Nervina, Cristina Teixeira

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: Orthodontic tooth movement results from increased inflammation and osteoclast activation. Since patients of all ages now routinely seek orthodontics treatment, we investigated whether age-dependent biologic responses to orthodontic force correlate with the rate of tooth movement. Methods: We studied 18 healthy subjects, adolescents (11-14 years) and adults (21-45 years), with Class II Division 1 malocclusion requiring 4 first premolar extractions. Canines were retracted with a constant force of 50 cN. Gingival crevicular fluid was collected before orthodontic treatment and at days 1, 7, 14, and 28 after the canine retraction. Cytokine (IL-1β, CCL2, TNF-α) and osteoclast markers (RANKL and MMP-9) were measured using antibody-based protein assays. Pain and discomfort were monitored with a numeric rating scale. The canine retraction rate was measured from study models taken at days 28 and 56. Results: Although the cytokine and osteoclast markers increased significantly in both age groups at days 1, 7, and 14, the increases were greater in adults than in adolescents. Interestingly, the rate of tooth movement in adults was significantly slower than in adolescents over the 56-day study period. Adults also reported significantly more discomfort and pain. Conclusions: Age is a significant variable contributing to the biologic response to orthodontic tooth movement. Adults exhibited a significantly higher level of cytokine and osteoclasts activity but, counterintuitively, had a significantly slower rate of tooth movement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)632-644
Number of pages13
JournalAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Volume153
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2018

Fingerprint

Tooth Movement Techniques
Orthodontics
Osteoclasts
Canidae
Cytokines
Angle Class II Malocclusion
Gingival Crevicular Fluid
Pain
Bicuspid
Matrix Metalloproteinases
Interleukin-1
Healthy Volunteers
Age Groups
Inflammation
Antibodies
Therapeutics
Proteins

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthodontics

Cite this

Age-dependent biologic response to orthodontic forces. / Alikhani, Mani; Chou, Michelle Y.; Khoo, Edmund; Alansari, Sarah; Kwal, Rachel; Elfersi, Tali; Almansour, Abdullah; Sangsuwon, Chinapa; Al Jearah, Mohammed; Nervina, Jeanne; Teixeira, Cristina.

In: American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Vol. 153, No. 5, 01.05.2018, p. 632-644.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Alikhani, M, Chou, MY, Khoo, E, Alansari, S, Kwal, R, Elfersi, T, Almansour, A, Sangsuwon, C, Al Jearah, M, Nervina, J & Teixeira, C 2018, 'Age-dependent biologic response to orthodontic forces', American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 153, no. 5, pp. 632-644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.09.016
Alikhani, Mani ; Chou, Michelle Y. ; Khoo, Edmund ; Alansari, Sarah ; Kwal, Rachel ; Elfersi, Tali ; Almansour, Abdullah ; Sangsuwon, Chinapa ; Al Jearah, Mohammed ; Nervina, Jeanne ; Teixeira, Cristina. / Age-dependent biologic response to orthodontic forces. In: American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2018 ; Vol. 153, No. 5. pp. 632-644.
@article{c081be8630794b2d9b23fb848e9218d8,
title = "Age-dependent biologic response to orthodontic forces",
abstract = "Introduction: Orthodontic tooth movement results from increased inflammation and osteoclast activation. Since patients of all ages now routinely seek orthodontics treatment, we investigated whether age-dependent biologic responses to orthodontic force correlate with the rate of tooth movement. Methods: We studied 18 healthy subjects, adolescents (11-14 years) and adults (21-45 years), with Class II Division 1 malocclusion requiring 4 first premolar extractions. Canines were retracted with a constant force of 50 cN. Gingival crevicular fluid was collected before orthodontic treatment and at days 1, 7, 14, and 28 after the canine retraction. Cytokine (IL-1β, CCL2, TNF-α) and osteoclast markers (RANKL and MMP-9) were measured using antibody-based protein assays. Pain and discomfort were monitored with a numeric rating scale. The canine retraction rate was measured from study models taken at days 28 and 56. Results: Although the cytokine and osteoclast markers increased significantly in both age groups at days 1, 7, and 14, the increases were greater in adults than in adolescents. Interestingly, the rate of tooth movement in adults was significantly slower than in adolescents over the 56-day study period. Adults also reported significantly more discomfort and pain. Conclusions: Age is a significant variable contributing to the biologic response to orthodontic tooth movement. Adults exhibited a significantly higher level of cytokine and osteoclasts activity but, counterintuitively, had a significantly slower rate of tooth movement.",
author = "Mani Alikhani and Chou, {Michelle Y.} and Edmund Khoo and Sarah Alansari and Rachel Kwal and Tali Elfersi and Abdullah Almansour and Chinapa Sangsuwon and {Al Jearah}, Mohammed and Jeanne Nervina and Cristina Teixeira",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.09.016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "153",
pages = "632--644",
journal = "American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics",
issn = "0889-5406",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Age-dependent biologic response to orthodontic forces

AU - Alikhani, Mani

AU - Chou, Michelle Y.

AU - Khoo, Edmund

AU - Alansari, Sarah

AU - Kwal, Rachel

AU - Elfersi, Tali

AU - Almansour, Abdullah

AU - Sangsuwon, Chinapa

AU - Al Jearah, Mohammed

AU - Nervina, Jeanne

AU - Teixeira, Cristina

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Introduction: Orthodontic tooth movement results from increased inflammation and osteoclast activation. Since patients of all ages now routinely seek orthodontics treatment, we investigated whether age-dependent biologic responses to orthodontic force correlate with the rate of tooth movement. Methods: We studied 18 healthy subjects, adolescents (11-14 years) and adults (21-45 years), with Class II Division 1 malocclusion requiring 4 first premolar extractions. Canines were retracted with a constant force of 50 cN. Gingival crevicular fluid was collected before orthodontic treatment and at days 1, 7, 14, and 28 after the canine retraction. Cytokine (IL-1β, CCL2, TNF-α) and osteoclast markers (RANKL and MMP-9) were measured using antibody-based protein assays. Pain and discomfort were monitored with a numeric rating scale. The canine retraction rate was measured from study models taken at days 28 and 56. Results: Although the cytokine and osteoclast markers increased significantly in both age groups at days 1, 7, and 14, the increases were greater in adults than in adolescents. Interestingly, the rate of tooth movement in adults was significantly slower than in adolescents over the 56-day study period. Adults also reported significantly more discomfort and pain. Conclusions: Age is a significant variable contributing to the biologic response to orthodontic tooth movement. Adults exhibited a significantly higher level of cytokine and osteoclasts activity but, counterintuitively, had a significantly slower rate of tooth movement.

AB - Introduction: Orthodontic tooth movement results from increased inflammation and osteoclast activation. Since patients of all ages now routinely seek orthodontics treatment, we investigated whether age-dependent biologic responses to orthodontic force correlate with the rate of tooth movement. Methods: We studied 18 healthy subjects, adolescents (11-14 years) and adults (21-45 years), with Class II Division 1 malocclusion requiring 4 first premolar extractions. Canines were retracted with a constant force of 50 cN. Gingival crevicular fluid was collected before orthodontic treatment and at days 1, 7, 14, and 28 after the canine retraction. Cytokine (IL-1β, CCL2, TNF-α) and osteoclast markers (RANKL and MMP-9) were measured using antibody-based protein assays. Pain and discomfort were monitored with a numeric rating scale. The canine retraction rate was measured from study models taken at days 28 and 56. Results: Although the cytokine and osteoclast markers increased significantly in both age groups at days 1, 7, and 14, the increases were greater in adults than in adolescents. Interestingly, the rate of tooth movement in adults was significantly slower than in adolescents over the 56-day study period. Adults also reported significantly more discomfort and pain. Conclusions: Age is a significant variable contributing to the biologic response to orthodontic tooth movement. Adults exhibited a significantly higher level of cytokine and osteoclasts activity but, counterintuitively, had a significantly slower rate of tooth movement.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046145383&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046145383&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.09.016

DO - 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.09.016

M3 - Article

VL - 153

SP - 632

EP - 644

JO - American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

JF - American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

SN - 0889-5406

IS - 5

ER -