TY - JOUR
T1 - Aggregates, Formational Emergence, and the Focus on Practice in Stone Artifact Archaeology
AU - Rezek, Zeljko
AU - Holdaway, Simon J.
AU - Olszewski, Deborah I.
AU - Lin, Sam C.
AU - Douglass, Matthew
AU - McPherron, Shannon P.
AU - Iovita, Radu
AU - Braun, David R.
AU - Sandgathe, Dennis
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank the editors of the journal and the three reviewers for their constructive reviews. This paper represents the results of a series of meetings held by the authors in 2012 and 2013 at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, in Honolulu, during the annual meetings of the Society for American Archaeology, and at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia. Participation at these meetings was supported by the Faculty of Arts, University of Auckland; the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation; Columbian College of Arts and Science at George Washington University; the Kolb Foundation, University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology; and the Max Planck Society. Harold Dibble instigated these meetings and he was a driving force behind the discussions that resulted in this paper. He is greatly missed by his colleagues.
Funding Information:
We thank the editors of the journal and the three reviewers for their constructive reviews. This paper represents the results of a series of meetings held by the authors in 2012 and 2013 at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, in Honolulu, during the annual meetings of the Society for American Archaeology, and at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia. Participation at these meetings was supported by the Faculty of Arts, University of Auckland; the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation; Columbian College of Arts and Science at George Washington University; the Kolb Foundation, University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology; and the Max Planck Society. Harold Dibble instigated these meetings and he was a driving force behind the discussions that resulted in this paper. He is greatly missed by his colleagues.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s).
PY - 2020/12/1
Y1 - 2020/12/1
N2 - The stone artifact record has been one of the major grounds for investigating our evolution. With the predominant focus on their morphological attributes and technological aspects of manufacture, stone artifacts and their assemblages have been analyzed as explicit measures of past behaviors, adaptations, and population histories. This analytical focus on technological and morphological appearance is one of the characteristics of the conventional approach for constructing inferences from this record. An equally persistent routine involves ascribing the emerged patterns and variability within the archaeological deposits directly to long-term central tendencies in human actions and cultural transmission. Here we re-evaluate this conventional approach. By invoking some of the known concerns and concepts about the formation of archaeological record, we introduce notions of aggregates and formational emergence to expand on the understanding of how artifacts accumulate, what these accumulations represent, and how the patterns and variability among them emerge. To infer behavior that could inform on past lifeways, we further promote a shift in the focus of analysis from the technological and morphological appearance of artifacts and assemblages to the practice of stone use. We argue for a more rigorous and multi-level inferential procedure in modeling behavioral adaptation and evolution.
AB - The stone artifact record has been one of the major grounds for investigating our evolution. With the predominant focus on their morphological attributes and technological aspects of manufacture, stone artifacts and their assemblages have been analyzed as explicit measures of past behaviors, adaptations, and population histories. This analytical focus on technological and morphological appearance is one of the characteristics of the conventional approach for constructing inferences from this record. An equally persistent routine involves ascribing the emerged patterns and variability within the archaeological deposits directly to long-term central tendencies in human actions and cultural transmission. Here we re-evaluate this conventional approach. By invoking some of the known concerns and concepts about the formation of archaeological record, we introduce notions of aggregates and formational emergence to expand on the understanding of how artifacts accumulate, what these accumulations represent, and how the patterns and variability among them emerge. To infer behavior that could inform on past lifeways, we further promote a shift in the focus of analysis from the technological and morphological appearance of artifacts and assemblages to the practice of stone use. We argue for a more rigorous and multi-level inferential procedure in modeling behavioral adaptation and evolution.
KW - Adaptation
KW - Aggregates
KW - Archaeological record
KW - Behavioral evolution
KW - Formational emergence
KW - Stone artifacts
KW - Stone-use practice
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85079147360&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85079147360&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10816-020-09445-y
DO - 10.1007/s10816-020-09445-y
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85079147360
SN - 1072-5369
VL - 27
SP - 887
EP - 928
JO - Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
JF - Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
IS - 4
ER -