Abstract
Do targeted aid programs have unintended consequences outside of the target issue area? We investigate this question with an examination of one of the largest targeted aid programs in the world: the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR). Critics of PEPFAR worry that a targeted program focusing on single diseases has a negative externality, in which the influx of massive amounts of target aid damages broader public health systems in countries that receive PEPFAR funds. Using a difference-in-differences identification strategy, we find statistical evidence that supports critics of targeted aid.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 281-294 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | World Development |
Volume | 67 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 1 2015 |
Keywords
- Africa
- Externalities
- Foreign aid
- Health
- State capacity
- Sub-Saharan Africa
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Development
- Sociology and Political Science
- Economics and Econometrics