TY - JOUR
T1 - Aligning English Language Proficiency Standards With Content Standards
T2 - Shared Opportunity and Responsibility Across English Learner Education and Content Areas
AU - Lee, Okhee
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 AERA.
PY - 2019/11/1
Y1 - 2019/11/1
N2 - The Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 mandates that English language proficiency (ELP) standards align with content standards. As the fast-growing population of English learners (ELs) is expected to meet college- and career-ready content standards, the purpose of this article is to highlight key issues in aligning ELP standards with content standards. The overarching question is how to align ELP standards with academically rigorous and language-intensive disciplinary practices of content standards while respecting and maintaining the nature of the discipline within each area. I begin by describing contributions and shortcomings of content standards and ELP standards. Next, I propose consideration of three components in aligning ELP standards with content standards: (a) norms of disciplinary practices across content areas, (b) developmental progressions of disciplinary practices across K–12 grade levels or bands and across content areas, and (c) language use across levels of English proficiency. For each component, the challenges in establishing alignment and potential trade-offs in addressing these challenges are discussed. Finally, I highlight how these challenges present opportunities for substantive collaboration between EL education and content areas to move these fields forward and ensure ELs achieve academically rigorous content standards while developing ELP.
AB - The Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 mandates that English language proficiency (ELP) standards align with content standards. As the fast-growing population of English learners (ELs) is expected to meet college- and career-ready content standards, the purpose of this article is to highlight key issues in aligning ELP standards with content standards. The overarching question is how to align ELP standards with academically rigorous and language-intensive disciplinary practices of content standards while respecting and maintaining the nature of the discipline within each area. I begin by describing contributions and shortcomings of content standards and ELP standards. Next, I propose consideration of three components in aligning ELP standards with content standards: (a) norms of disciplinary practices across content areas, (b) developmental progressions of disciplinary practices across K–12 grade levels or bands and across content areas, and (c) language use across levels of English proficiency. For each component, the challenges in establishing alignment and potential trade-offs in addressing these challenges are discussed. Finally, I highlight how these challenges present opportunities for substantive collaboration between EL education and content areas to move these fields forward and ensure ELs achieve academically rigorous content standards while developing ELP.
KW - bilingual/bicultural
KW - educational policy
KW - equity
KW - literacy
KW - mathematics education
KW - policy analysis
KW - science education
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074557618&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074557618&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3102/0013189X19872497
DO - 10.3102/0013189X19872497
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85074557618
SN - 0013-189X
VL - 48
SP - 534
EP - 542
JO - Educational Researcher
JF - Educational Researcher
IS - 8
ER -