TY - JOUR
T1 - American Hegemony and International Theory at the Council on Foreign Relations, 1953–1954
AU - McCourt, David M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2020/5/3
Y1 - 2020/5/3
N2 - This paper tells the story of a Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) study group on the theory of international relations held in 1953–1954. The study group took place at a time of intense struggle over the nature and value of international relations as an academic and policy field, with theory a key stake. Funded by the Carnegie Corporation, organized by the CFR, and held at the same time as another theory conference at the Rockefeller Foundation, the group illustrates how central organizations of the American foreign policy establishment acted as the midwives of academic International Relations (IR), and IR theory in particular. Despite its ties to American hegemony, the group did not come together behind a theory designed to guide policy-makers in the exercise of American power. Offering a glimpse into a road to theory not taken, the group asserted the essential limits of all knowledge, and the need for a theoretically pluralist International Relations. The vision of theory it entertained was not thereby defined by powerful academic trends toward behavioralism, positivism, and systems-theory, nor by the Realpolitik-inspired ‘realist’ theory promoted by the Rockefeller group.
AB - This paper tells the story of a Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) study group on the theory of international relations held in 1953–1954. The study group took place at a time of intense struggle over the nature and value of international relations as an academic and policy field, with theory a key stake. Funded by the Carnegie Corporation, organized by the CFR, and held at the same time as another theory conference at the Rockefeller Foundation, the group illustrates how central organizations of the American foreign policy establishment acted as the midwives of academic International Relations (IR), and IR theory in particular. Despite its ties to American hegemony, the group did not come together behind a theory designed to guide policy-makers in the exercise of American power. Offering a glimpse into a road to theory not taken, the group asserted the essential limits of all knowledge, and the need for a theoretically pluralist International Relations. The vision of theory it entertained was not thereby defined by powerful academic trends toward behavioralism, positivism, and systems-theory, nor by the Realpolitik-inspired ‘realist’ theory promoted by the Rockefeller group.
KW - American hegemony
KW - Council on Foreign Relations
KW - History of IR
KW - IR theory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065287862&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065287862&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/07075332.2019.1608283
DO - 10.1080/07075332.2019.1608283
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85065287862
SN - 0707-5332
VL - 42
SP - 565
EP - 588
JO - International History Review
JF - International History Review
IS - 3
ER -