TY - JOUR
T1 - An anthropometric model to estimate neonatal fat mass using air displacement plethysmography
AU - Deierlein, Andrea L.
AU - Thornton, John
AU - Hull, Holly
AU - Paley, Charles
AU - Gallagher, Dympna
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to acknowledge Jacqueline Bauer, Amy Hsu, Francis Janumala, Ying Ji, Premilla Matthews, Xavier P-Sunyer, Barak Rosen, and Sophia Scarpelli. Funding for this study was provided by NIH RO1-DK42618, RR24156, P30-DK-26687.
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Background: Current validated neonatal body composition methods are limited/impractical for use outside of a clinical setting because they are labor intensive, time consuming, and require expensive equipment. The purpose of this study was to develop an anthropometric model to estimate neonatal fat mass (kg) using an air displacement plethysmography (PEA POD Infant Body Composition System) as the criterion. Methods. A total of 128 healthy term infants, 60 females and 68 males, from a multiethnic cohort were included in the analyses. Gender, race/ethnicity, gestational age, age (in days), anthropometric measurements of weight, length, abdominal circumference, skin-fold thicknesses (triceps, biceps, sub scapular, and thigh), and body composition by PEA POD were collected within 1-3 days of birth. Backward stepwise linear regression was used to determine the model that best predicted neonatal fat mass. Results: The statistical model that best predicted neonatal fat mass (kg) was: -0.012 -0.064*gender + 0.024*day of measurement post-delivery -0.150*weight (kg) + 0.055*weight (kg) 2 + 0.046*ethnicity + 0.020*sum of three skin-fold thicknesses (triceps, sub scapular, and thigh); R 2 = 0.81, MSE = 0.08 kg. Conclusions: Our anthropometric model explained 81% of the variance in neonatal fat mass. Future studies with a greater variety of neonatal anthropometric measurements may provide equations that explain more of the variance.
AB - Background: Current validated neonatal body composition methods are limited/impractical for use outside of a clinical setting because they are labor intensive, time consuming, and require expensive equipment. The purpose of this study was to develop an anthropometric model to estimate neonatal fat mass (kg) using an air displacement plethysmography (PEA POD Infant Body Composition System) as the criterion. Methods. A total of 128 healthy term infants, 60 females and 68 males, from a multiethnic cohort were included in the analyses. Gender, race/ethnicity, gestational age, age (in days), anthropometric measurements of weight, length, abdominal circumference, skin-fold thicknesses (triceps, biceps, sub scapular, and thigh), and body composition by PEA POD were collected within 1-3 days of birth. Backward stepwise linear regression was used to determine the model that best predicted neonatal fat mass. Results: The statistical model that best predicted neonatal fat mass (kg) was: -0.012 -0.064*gender + 0.024*day of measurement post-delivery -0.150*weight (kg) + 0.055*weight (kg) 2 + 0.046*ethnicity + 0.020*sum of three skin-fold thicknesses (triceps, sub scapular, and thigh); R 2 = 0.81, MSE = 0.08 kg. Conclusions: Our anthropometric model explained 81% of the variance in neonatal fat mass. Future studies with a greater variety of neonatal anthropometric measurements may provide equations that explain more of the variance.
KW - Air displacement plethysmography
KW - Anthropometry
KW - Fat mass
KW - Neonate
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858595149&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84858595149&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/1743-7075-9-21
DO - 10.1186/1743-7075-9-21
M3 - Article
C2 - 22436534
AN - SCOPUS:84858595149
SN - 1743-7075
VL - 9
JO - Nutrition and Metabolism
JF - Nutrition and Metabolism
M1 - 21
ER -