An evaluation of three blood pressure methods in a stabilized acute trauma population

Elizabeth M. Norman, Diane Cadaleta, C. Clayton Griffin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Blood pressure values were evaluated in 30 acute adult trauma patients using two indirect methods, the bell and diaphragm components of the stethoscope, and one direct arterial mediod. Kl, K4, and K5 measurements were taken 4 to 72 hours (M = 30) after admission when vital signs had stabilized. Data were collected using a random-zero (KL) sphygmomanometer for indirect blood pressure and radial intraarterial cannula for direct blood pressure. The sequence of measurement was randomized and variables shown to alter blood pressure values were controlled. There was no overall significant difference in Kl, K4, and-K5 blood pressures among the three methods. These results suggest that when clinicians monitor variables such as the frequency response of arterial lines and peripheral vascular resistance, indirect blood pressure methods are reliable for use with stabilized trauma patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)86-89
Number of pages4
JournalNursing research
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1991

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Nursing


Dive into the research topics of 'An evaluation of three blood pressure methods in a stabilized acute trauma population'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this