TY - JOUR
T1 - An Impartial Measure of Collective Action Development and Validation of the Belief-Aligned Collective Action Scale
AU - Cervone, Carmen
AU - Suitner, Caterina
AU - Carraro, Luciana
AU - Maass, Anne
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Hogrefe Publishing GmbH. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/5/1
Y1 - 2024/5/1
N2 - In three studies, we developed and validated the Belief-aligned Collective Action scale (BCA), a new measure of collective action that discriminates the so far confounded engagement in collective action from the ideological stance on the issue. In Studies 1a (N = 585 Italian adult participants, 61% women) and 1b (N = 296 British adult participants, 52% women), an Exploratory Factor Analysis identified two factors, Normative and Non-normative actions. In Study 2 (N = 602 Italian adult participants, 50% women), a bifactor Confirmatory Factor Analysis showed an adequate fit of the two-factor structure. Across studies, the scale presents good internal reliability (as indicated by Cronbach s ? and ? total) and correlations in the predicted direction with common predictors of collective action, namely efficacy, anger, and group identity. Furthermore, Study 2 shows the generalizability of the scale to multiple topics, of which some are more relevant to left-wing people (e.g., wealth tax) and some to right-wing people (e.g., abortion). In these cases, we find no evidence for the effect of ideological variables such as political orientation and system justification. This tool allows researchers to assess collective action unbiasedly, contributing to the bridging of the ideological knowledge gap in the field of social psychology.
AB - In three studies, we developed and validated the Belief-aligned Collective Action scale (BCA), a new measure of collective action that discriminates the so far confounded engagement in collective action from the ideological stance on the issue. In Studies 1a (N = 585 Italian adult participants, 61% women) and 1b (N = 296 British adult participants, 52% women), an Exploratory Factor Analysis identified two factors, Normative and Non-normative actions. In Study 2 (N = 602 Italian adult participants, 50% women), a bifactor Confirmatory Factor Analysis showed an adequate fit of the two-factor structure. Across studies, the scale presents good internal reliability (as indicated by Cronbach s ? and ? total) and correlations in the predicted direction with common predictors of collective action, namely efficacy, anger, and group identity. Furthermore, Study 2 shows the generalizability of the scale to multiple topics, of which some are more relevant to left-wing people (e.g., wealth tax) and some to right-wing people (e.g., abortion). In these cases, we find no evidence for the effect of ideological variables such as political orientation and system justification. This tool allows researchers to assess collective action unbiasedly, contributing to the bridging of the ideological knowledge gap in the field of social psychology.
KW - activism
KW - collective action
KW - inequality
KW - scale validation
KW - social issues
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85152001271&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85152001271&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1027/1015-5759/a000762
DO - 10.1027/1015-5759/a000762
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85152001271
SN - 1015-5759
VL - 40
SP - 258
EP - 268
JO - European Journal of Psychological Assessment
JF - European Journal of Psychological Assessment
IS - 3
ER -