TY - JOUR
T1 - An investigation of structure, flexibility, and function variables that discriminate asymptomatic foot types
AU - Shultz, Sarah P.
AU - Song, Jinsup
AU - Kraszewski, Andrew P.
AU - Hafer, Jocelyn F.
AU - Rao, Smita
AU - Backus, Sherry
AU - Mootanah, Rajshree
AU - Hillstrom, Howard J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Human Kinetics, Inc.
PY - 2017/6
Y1 - 2017/6
N2 - It has been suggested that foot type considers not only foot structure (high, normal, low arch), but also function (overpronation, normal, oversupination) and flexibility (reduced, normal, excessive). Therefore, this study used canonical regression analyses to assess which variables of foot structure, function, and flexibility can accurately discriminate between clinical foot type classifications. The feet of 61 asymptomatic, healthy adults (18-77 years) were classified as cavus (N = 24), rectus (N = 54), or planus (N = 44) using standard clinical measures. Custom jigs assessed foot structure and flexibility. Foot function was assessed using an emed-x plantar pressure measuring device. Canonical regression analyses were applied separately to extract essential structure, flexibility, and function variables. A third canonical regression analysis was performed on the extracted variables to identify a combined model. The initial combined model included 30 extracted variables; however 5 terminal variables (malleolar valgus index, arch height index while sitting, first metatarsophalangeal joint laxity while standing, pressure-time integral and maximum contact area of medial arch) were able to correctly predict 80.7% of foot types. These remaining variables focused on specific foot characteristics (hindfoot alignment, arch height, midfoot mechanics, Windlass mechanism) that could be essential to discriminating foot type.
AB - It has been suggested that foot type considers not only foot structure (high, normal, low arch), but also function (overpronation, normal, oversupination) and flexibility (reduced, normal, excessive). Therefore, this study used canonical regression analyses to assess which variables of foot structure, function, and flexibility can accurately discriminate between clinical foot type classifications. The feet of 61 asymptomatic, healthy adults (18-77 years) were classified as cavus (N = 24), rectus (N = 54), or planus (N = 44) using standard clinical measures. Custom jigs assessed foot structure and flexibility. Foot function was assessed using an emed-x plantar pressure measuring device. Canonical regression analyses were applied separately to extract essential structure, flexibility, and function variables. A third canonical regression analysis was performed on the extracted variables to identify a combined model. The initial combined model included 30 extracted variables; however 5 terminal variables (malleolar valgus index, arch height index while sitting, first metatarsophalangeal joint laxity while standing, pressure-time integral and maximum contact area of medial arch) were able to correctly predict 80.7% of foot types. These remaining variables focused on specific foot characteristics (hindfoot alignment, arch height, midfoot mechanics, Windlass mechanism) that could be essential to discriminating foot type.
KW - Clinical biomechanics
KW - Kinematics
KW - Musculoskeletal
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027019983&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027019983&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1123/jab.2016-0001
DO - 10.1123/jab.2016-0001
M3 - Article
C2 - 27992254
AN - SCOPUS:85027019983
SN - 1065-8483
VL - 33
SP - 203
EP - 210
JO - Journal of Applied Biomechanics
JF - Journal of Applied Biomechanics
IS - 3
ER -