TY - JOUR
T1 - An Uncontrolled Trial of Flexibly Delivered Relationship Education With Low-Income, Unmarried Perinatal Couples
AU - Heyman, Richard E.
AU - Baucom, Katherine J.W.
AU - Slep, Amy M.Smith
AU - Mitnick, Danielle M.
AU - Halford, W. Kim
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by grants from the Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (grant 90FE013101) and the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases at the National Institutes of Health (grant K23DK115820). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services or the National Institutes of Health.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 National Council on Family Relations
PY - 2020/10/1
Y1 - 2020/10/1
N2 - Objective: To examine couple and parenting outcomes from an American version of Couple CARE for Parents (CCP) in low-income, unmarried couples. Background: We adapted an evidence-based, flexibly delivered program for use with low-income, unmarried couples, for whom the outcome literature is scarce. Method: Couples (N = 443) were recruited from maternity units and began CCP. They completed measures before, during, and immediately after the intervention and again 6 months later. Results: Experience of moderate psychological intimate partner violence (IPV) declined and perceived parenting efficacy increased over time; there was no change in severe psychological or physical IPV. Individuals with lower levels of relationship commitment than their partners showed improvement in relationship satisfaction, whereas those with similar or higher levels of commitment maintained their baseline levels despite being in a period of expected satisfaction decline. Conclusion: CCP showed some signs of helping low-income couples during a stressful period, and its flexible service delivery model allowed these couples to participate by reducing the impediments of transportation challenges, conflicting work schedules, and overall time poverty. Implications: The results of this study suggest practitioners interested in using CCP with low-income couples would likely maximize the impact by (a) focusing on pregnant, first-time parents; (b) integrating CCP within postnatal health care; and (c) assuming that a considerable minority of couples will avail themselves of only up to two sessions, and thus practitioners should frontload content, making other content optional or just-in-time. In addition, nonpsychoeducational elements (e.g., gamification, easy computerized tasks to reduce angry responses, watching couple-themed movies) could enliven preventative offerings for perinatal couples.
AB - Objective: To examine couple and parenting outcomes from an American version of Couple CARE for Parents (CCP) in low-income, unmarried couples. Background: We adapted an evidence-based, flexibly delivered program for use with low-income, unmarried couples, for whom the outcome literature is scarce. Method: Couples (N = 443) were recruited from maternity units and began CCP. They completed measures before, during, and immediately after the intervention and again 6 months later. Results: Experience of moderate psychological intimate partner violence (IPV) declined and perceived parenting efficacy increased over time; there was no change in severe psychological or physical IPV. Individuals with lower levels of relationship commitment than their partners showed improvement in relationship satisfaction, whereas those with similar or higher levels of commitment maintained their baseline levels despite being in a period of expected satisfaction decline. Conclusion: CCP showed some signs of helping low-income couples during a stressful period, and its flexible service delivery model allowed these couples to participate by reducing the impediments of transportation challenges, conflicting work schedules, and overall time poverty. Implications: The results of this study suggest practitioners interested in using CCP with low-income couples would likely maximize the impact by (a) focusing on pregnant, first-time parents; (b) integrating CCP within postnatal health care; and (c) assuming that a considerable minority of couples will avail themselves of only up to two sessions, and thus practitioners should frontload content, making other content optional or just-in-time. In addition, nonpsychoeducational elements (e.g., gamification, easy computerized tasks to reduce angry responses, watching couple-themed movies) could enliven preventative offerings for perinatal couples.
KW - couple relationship
KW - intimate partner violence
KW - parenting
KW - prevention
KW - socioeconomic status
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084495175&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85084495175&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/fare.12431
DO - 10.1111/fare.12431
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85084495175
SN - 0197-6664
VL - 69
SP - 849
EP - 864
JO - Family Relations
JF - Family Relations
IS - 4
ER -