TY - JOUR
T1 - Antimicrobial Resistance
T2 - Is Health Technology Assessment Part of the Solution or Part of the Problem?
AU - Colson, Abigail R.
AU - Morton, Alec
AU - Årdal, Christine
AU - Chalkidou, Kalipso
AU - Davies, Sally C.
AU - Garrison, Louis P.
AU - Jit, Mark
AU - Laxminarayan, Ramanan
AU - Megiddo, Itamar
AU - Morel, Chantal
AU - Nonvignon, Justice
AU - Outterson, Kevin
AU - Rex, John H.
AU - Sarker, Abdur Razzaque
AU - Sculpher, Mark
AU - Woods, Beth
AU - Xiao, Yue
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 ISPOR–The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - Antimicrobial resistance is a serious challenge to the success and sustainability of our healthcare systems. There has been increasing policy attention given to antimicrobial resistance in the last few years, and increased amounts of funding have been channeled into funding for research and development of antimicrobial agents. Nevertheless, manufacturers doubt whether there will be a market for new antimicrobial technologies sufficient to enable them to recoup their investment. Health technology assessment (HTA) has a critical role in creating confidence that if valuable technologies can be developed they will be reimbursed at a level that captures their true value. We identify 3 deficiencies of current HTA processes for appraising antimicrobial agents: a methods-centric approach rather than problem-centric approach for dealing with new challenges, a lack of tools for thinking about changing patterns of infection, and the absence of an approach to epidemiological risks. We argue that, to play their role more effectively, HTA agencies need to broaden their methodological tool kit, design and communicate their analysis to a wider set of users, and incorporate long-term policy goals, such as containing resistance, as part of their evaluation criteria alongside immediate health gains.
AB - Antimicrobial resistance is a serious challenge to the success and sustainability of our healthcare systems. There has been increasing policy attention given to antimicrobial resistance in the last few years, and increased amounts of funding have been channeled into funding for research and development of antimicrobial agents. Nevertheless, manufacturers doubt whether there will be a market for new antimicrobial technologies sufficient to enable them to recoup their investment. Health technology assessment (HTA) has a critical role in creating confidence that if valuable technologies can be developed they will be reimbursed at a level that captures their true value. We identify 3 deficiencies of current HTA processes for appraising antimicrobial agents: a methods-centric approach rather than problem-centric approach for dealing with new challenges, a lack of tools for thinking about changing patterns of infection, and the absence of an approach to epidemiological risks. We argue that, to play their role more effectively, HTA agencies need to broaden their methodological tool kit, design and communicate their analysis to a wider set of users, and incorporate long-term policy goals, such as containing resistance, as part of their evaluation criteria alongside immediate health gains.
KW - antibiotic agents
KW - antimicrobial resistance
KW - economic evaluation
KW - health technology assessment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115175942&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85115175942&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jval.2021.06.002
DO - 10.1016/j.jval.2021.06.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 34838281
AN - SCOPUS:85115175942
SN - 1098-3015
VL - 24
SP - 1828
EP - 1834
JO - Value in Health
JF - Value in Health
IS - 12
ER -