Assessing the feasibility and impact of federal childhood obesity policies

Victoria L. Brescoll, Rogan Kersh, Kelly D. Brownell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Research on childhood obesity has primarily been conducted by experts in nutrition, psychology, and medicine. Only recently have public policy scholars devoted serious work to this burgeoning public health crisis. Here the authors advance that research by surveying national experts in health/nutrition and health policy on the public health impact and the political feasibility of fifty-one federal policy options for addressing childhood obesity. Policies that were viewed as politically infeasible but having a great impact on childhood obesity emphasized outright bans on certain activities. In contrast, education and information dissemination policies were viewed as having the potential to receive a favorable hearing from national policy makers but little potential public health impact. Both nutrition and policy experts believed that increasing funding for research would be beneficial and politically feasible. A central need for the field is to develop the means to make high-impact policies more politically feasible.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)178-194
Number of pages17
JournalAnnals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Volume615
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2008

Keywords

  • Childhood obesity
  • Nutrition
  • Obesity policy
  • Obesity prevention
  • Public policy
  • School lunch

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • General Social Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing the feasibility and impact of federal childhood obesity policies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this