Assessing the impact of federal and state preemption in public health: A framework for decision makers

Mark Pertschuk, Jennifer L. Pomeranz, Julie Ralston Aoki, Michelle A. Larkin, Marjorie Paloma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In the United States, state and local public health policies play a fundamental role in innovation and progress. Preemption, by which Congress or the state legislatures limit the authority of lower jurisdictions, can eliminate the benefits of state and local policy initiatives. Preemption can also have a negative impact on enforcement, civic engagement, and grassroots movement building.In June 2011, the Institute of Medicine published a groundbreaking report on policy and law that considered preemption as a crosscutting issue in public health. The Institute of Medicine recommended that federal and state policy makers "should set minimum standards..allowing states and localities to further protect the health and safety of their inhabitants," and "should avoid language that hinders public health action."The Preemption Framework is a tool to SUPPL.ort effective decision making by helping the public health field anticipate, assess, and, if necessary, counter preemptive policy proposals. We review the consequences of preemption, including its potential impact on grassroots public health movements, and propose practical questions and considerations to assist decision makers in responding to preemptive proposals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)213-219
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Public Health Management and Practice
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2013

Fingerprint

Public Health
National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.) Health and Medicine Division
Public Policy
Health Policy
Administrative Personnel
Decision Making
Language
Safety
Health

Keywords

  • framework
  • grassroots
  • local policy
  • preemption
  • state policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health Policy
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Assessing the impact of federal and state preemption in public health : A framework for decision makers. / Pertschuk, Mark; Pomeranz, Jennifer L.; Aoki, Julie Ralston; Larkin, Michelle A.; Paloma, Marjorie.

In: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, Vol. 19, No. 3, 05.2013, p. 213-219.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pertschuk, Mark ; Pomeranz, Jennifer L. ; Aoki, Julie Ralston ; Larkin, Michelle A. ; Paloma, Marjorie. / Assessing the impact of federal and state preemption in public health : A framework for decision makers. In: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. 2013 ; Vol. 19, No. 3. pp. 213-219.
@article{cce8337ec75849c8885b6874319a6539,
title = "Assessing the impact of federal and state preemption in public health: A framework for decision makers",
abstract = "In the United States, state and local public health policies play a fundamental role in innovation and progress. Preemption, by which Congress or the state legislatures limit the authority of lower jurisdictions, can eliminate the benefits of state and local policy initiatives. Preemption can also have a negative impact on enforcement, civic engagement, and grassroots movement building.In June 2011, the Institute of Medicine published a groundbreaking report on policy and law that considered preemption as a crosscutting issue in public health. The Institute of Medicine recommended that federal and state policy makers {"}should set minimum standards..allowing states and localities to further protect the health and safety of their inhabitants,{"} and {"}should avoid language that hinders public health action.{"}The Preemption Framework is a tool to SUPPL.ort effective decision making by helping the public health field anticipate, assess, and, if necessary, counter preemptive policy proposals. We review the consequences of preemption, including its potential impact on grassroots public health movements, and propose practical questions and considerations to assist decision makers in responding to preemptive proposals.",
keywords = "framework, grassroots, local policy, preemption, state policy",
author = "Mark Pertschuk and Pomeranz, {Jennifer L.} and Aoki, {Julie Ralston} and Larkin, {Michelle A.} and Marjorie Paloma",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182582a57",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "213--219",
journal = "Journal of Public Health Management and Practice",
issn = "1078-4659",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the impact of federal and state preemption in public health

T2 - A framework for decision makers

AU - Pertschuk, Mark

AU - Pomeranz, Jennifer L.

AU - Aoki, Julie Ralston

AU - Larkin, Michelle A.

AU - Paloma, Marjorie

PY - 2013/5

Y1 - 2013/5

N2 - In the United States, state and local public health policies play a fundamental role in innovation and progress. Preemption, by which Congress or the state legislatures limit the authority of lower jurisdictions, can eliminate the benefits of state and local policy initiatives. Preemption can also have a negative impact on enforcement, civic engagement, and grassroots movement building.In June 2011, the Institute of Medicine published a groundbreaking report on policy and law that considered preemption as a crosscutting issue in public health. The Institute of Medicine recommended that federal and state policy makers "should set minimum standards..allowing states and localities to further protect the health and safety of their inhabitants," and "should avoid language that hinders public health action."The Preemption Framework is a tool to SUPPL.ort effective decision making by helping the public health field anticipate, assess, and, if necessary, counter preemptive policy proposals. We review the consequences of preemption, including its potential impact on grassroots public health movements, and propose practical questions and considerations to assist decision makers in responding to preemptive proposals.

AB - In the United States, state and local public health policies play a fundamental role in innovation and progress. Preemption, by which Congress or the state legislatures limit the authority of lower jurisdictions, can eliminate the benefits of state and local policy initiatives. Preemption can also have a negative impact on enforcement, civic engagement, and grassroots movement building.In June 2011, the Institute of Medicine published a groundbreaking report on policy and law that considered preemption as a crosscutting issue in public health. The Institute of Medicine recommended that federal and state policy makers "should set minimum standards..allowing states and localities to further protect the health and safety of their inhabitants," and "should avoid language that hinders public health action."The Preemption Framework is a tool to SUPPL.ort effective decision making by helping the public health field anticipate, assess, and, if necessary, counter preemptive policy proposals. We review the consequences of preemption, including its potential impact on grassroots public health movements, and propose practical questions and considerations to assist decision makers in responding to preemptive proposals.

KW - framework

KW - grassroots

KW - local policy

KW - preemption

KW - state policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876124694&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876124694&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182582a57

DO - 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182582a57

M3 - Article

C2 - 22759986

AN - SCOPUS:84876124694

VL - 19

SP - 213

EP - 219

JO - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

JF - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

SN - 1078-4659

IS - 3

ER -