TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness using apparent diffusion coefficient values
T2 - impact of patient race and age
AU - Tamada, Tsutomu
AU - Prabhu, Vinay
AU - Li, Jianhong
AU - Babb, James S.
AU - Taneja, Samir S.
AU - Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
PY - 2017/6/1
Y1 - 2017/6/1
N2 - Purpose: To assess the impact of patient race and age on the performance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness. Materials and methods: 457 prostate cancer patients who underwent 3T phased-array coil prostate MRI including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI; maximal b-value 1000 s/mm2) before prostatectomy were included. Mean ADC of a single dominant lesion was measured in each patient, using histopathologic findings from the prostatectomy specimen as reference. In subsets defined by race and age, ADC values were compared between Gleason score (GS) ≤ 3 + 4 and GS ≥ 4 + 3 tumors. Results: 81% of patients were Caucasian, 12% African-American, 7% Asian-American. 13% were <55 years, 42% 55–64 years, 41% 65–74 years, and 4% ≥75 years. 63% were GS ≤ 3 + 4, 37% GS ≥ 4 + 3. ADC was significantly lower in GS ≥ 4 + 3 tumors than in GS ≤ 3 + 4 tumors in the entire cohort, as well as in Caucasian, African-American, and all four age groups (P ≤ 0.015). AUC for differentiation of GS ≤ 3 + 4 and GS ≥ 4 + 3 as well as optimal ADC threshold was Caucasian: 0.73/≤848; African-American: 0.76/≤780; Asian-American: 0.66/≤839: <55 years, 0.73/≤830; 55–64 years, 0.71/≤800; 65–74 years, 0.74/≤872; ≥75 years, 0.79/≤880. A race-optimized ADC threshold resulted in higher specificity in African-American than Caucasian men (84.9% vs. 67.1%, P = 0.045); age-optimized ADC threshold resulted in higher sensitivity in patients aged ≥75 years than <55 years or 55–64 years (100.0% vs. 53.6%–73.3%; P < 0.001). Conclusion: Patients’ race and age may impact the diagnostic performance and optimal threshold when applying ADC values for evaluation of prostate cancer aggressiveness.
AB - Purpose: To assess the impact of patient race and age on the performance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness. Materials and methods: 457 prostate cancer patients who underwent 3T phased-array coil prostate MRI including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI; maximal b-value 1000 s/mm2) before prostatectomy were included. Mean ADC of a single dominant lesion was measured in each patient, using histopathologic findings from the prostatectomy specimen as reference. In subsets defined by race and age, ADC values were compared between Gleason score (GS) ≤ 3 + 4 and GS ≥ 4 + 3 tumors. Results: 81% of patients were Caucasian, 12% African-American, 7% Asian-American. 13% were <55 years, 42% 55–64 years, 41% 65–74 years, and 4% ≥75 years. 63% were GS ≤ 3 + 4, 37% GS ≥ 4 + 3. ADC was significantly lower in GS ≥ 4 + 3 tumors than in GS ≤ 3 + 4 tumors in the entire cohort, as well as in Caucasian, African-American, and all four age groups (P ≤ 0.015). AUC for differentiation of GS ≤ 3 + 4 and GS ≥ 4 + 3 as well as optimal ADC threshold was Caucasian: 0.73/≤848; African-American: 0.76/≤780; Asian-American: 0.66/≤839: <55 years, 0.73/≤830; 55–64 years, 0.71/≤800; 65–74 years, 0.74/≤872; ≥75 years, 0.79/≤880. A race-optimized ADC threshold resulted in higher specificity in African-American than Caucasian men (84.9% vs. 67.1%, P = 0.045); age-optimized ADC threshold resulted in higher sensitivity in patients aged ≥75 years than <55 years or 55–64 years (100.0% vs. 53.6%–73.3%; P < 0.001). Conclusion: Patients’ race and age may impact the diagnostic performance and optimal threshold when applying ADC values for evaluation of prostate cancer aggressiveness.
KW - Age
KW - DWI
KW - MRI
KW - Prostate cancer
KW - Race
KW - Tumor aggressiveness
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011628787&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011628787&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00261-017-1058-y
DO - 10.1007/s00261-017-1058-y
M3 - Article
C2 - 28161826
AN - SCOPUS:85011628787
SN - 2366-004X
VL - 42
SP - 1744
EP - 1751
JO - Abdominal Radiology
JF - Abdominal Radiology
IS - 6
ER -