TY - JOUR
T1 - Association of multivitamin and mineral supplementation and risk of cardiovascular disease
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Kim, Joonseok
AU - Choi, Jaehyoung
AU - Kwon, Soo Young
AU - McEvoy, John W.
AU - Blaha, Michael J.
AU - Blumenthal, Roger S.
AU - Guallar, Eliseo
AU - Zhao, Di
AU - Michos, Erin D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 American Heart Association, Inc.
PY - 2018/7/1
Y1 - 2018/7/1
N2 - Background: Multiple studies have attempted to identify the association between multivitamin/mineral (MVM) supplementation and cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes, but the benefits remain controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the associations between MVM supplementation and various CVD outcomes, including coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke. Methods and Results: We conducted a comprehensive search of Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies published between January 1970 and August 2016. We included clinical trials and prospective cohort studies in the general population evaluating associations between MVM supplementation and CVD outcomes. Data extraction and quality assessment were independently conducted by 2 authors, and a third author resolved discrepancies. Eighteen studies with 2 019 862 participants and 18 363 326 person-years of follow-up were included in the analysis. Five studies specified the dose/type of MVM supplement and the rest did not. Overall, there was no association between MVM supplementation and CVD mortality (relative risk [RR], 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-1.04), CHD mortality (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.92-1.13), stroke mortality (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.82-1.09), or stroke incidence (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.91-1.05). There was no association between MVM supplements and CVD or CHD mortality in prespecified subgroups categorized by mean follow-up period, mean age, period of MVM use, sex, type of population, exclusion of patients with history of CHD, and adjustment for diet, adjustment for smoking, adjustment for physical activity, and study site. In contrast, MVM use did seem to be associated with a lower risk of CHD incidence (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.79-0.97). However, this association did not remain significant in the pooled subgroup analysis of randomized controlled trials (RR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.80-1.19). Conclusions: Our meta-analysis of clinical trials and prospective cohort studies demonstrates that MVM supplementation does not improve cardiovascular outcomes in the general population.
AB - Background: Multiple studies have attempted to identify the association between multivitamin/mineral (MVM) supplementation and cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes, but the benefits remain controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the associations between MVM supplementation and various CVD outcomes, including coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke. Methods and Results: We conducted a comprehensive search of Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies published between January 1970 and August 2016. We included clinical trials and prospective cohort studies in the general population evaluating associations between MVM supplementation and CVD outcomes. Data extraction and quality assessment were independently conducted by 2 authors, and a third author resolved discrepancies. Eighteen studies with 2 019 862 participants and 18 363 326 person-years of follow-up were included in the analysis. Five studies specified the dose/type of MVM supplement and the rest did not. Overall, there was no association between MVM supplementation and CVD mortality (relative risk [RR], 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-1.04), CHD mortality (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.92-1.13), stroke mortality (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.82-1.09), or stroke incidence (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.91-1.05). There was no association between MVM supplements and CVD or CHD mortality in prespecified subgroups categorized by mean follow-up period, mean age, period of MVM use, sex, type of population, exclusion of patients with history of CHD, and adjustment for diet, adjustment for smoking, adjustment for physical activity, and study site. In contrast, MVM use did seem to be associated with a lower risk of CHD incidence (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.79-0.97). However, this association did not remain significant in the pooled subgroup analysis of randomized controlled trials (RR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.80-1.19). Conclusions: Our meta-analysis of clinical trials and prospective cohort studies demonstrates that MVM supplementation does not improve cardiovascular outcomes in the general population.
KW - cardiovascular diseases
KW - coronary disease
KW - incidence
KW - mortality
KW - myocardial infarction
KW - stroke
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052917293&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052917293&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004224
DO - 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004224
M3 - Article
C2 - 29991644
AN - SCOPUS:85052917293
SN - 1941-7713
VL - 11
JO - Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
JF - Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
IS - 7
M1 - e004224
ER -