Abstract
The classic preference reversal phenomenon, where monetary evaluations contra-dict risky choices, has been argued to arise due to a focus on outcomes during the evaluation of alternatives, leading to overpricing of long-shot options. Such an ex-planation makes the implicit assumption that attentional shifts drive the phenomenon. We conducted an eye-tracking study to causally test this hypothesis by comparing a treatment based on cardinal, monetary evaluations with a different treatment avoiding a monetary frame. We find a significant treatment effect in the form of a shift in attention toward outcomes (relative to probabilities) when evaluations are monetary. Our evidence suggests that attentional shifts resulting from the monetary frame of evaluations are a driver of preference reversals.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 57-93 |
Number of pages | 37 |
Journal | Judgment and Decision Making |
Volume | 16 |
Issue number | 1 |
State | Published - Jan 2021 |
Keywords
- Compatibility hypothesis
- Eye-tracking
- Preference reversals
- Ranking
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Decision Sciences
- Applied Psychology
- Economics and Econometrics