Audio-computerized self-interviewing versus face-to-face interviewing for research data collection at drug abuse treatment programs

Theresa E. Perlis, Don C. Des Jarlais, Samuel R. Friedman, Kamyar Arasteh, Charles F. Turner

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review


Aims: To assess audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (A-CASI) as a mode of data collection with injecting drug users (IDUs) entering two drug treatment programs in New York City. A-CASI has been found to increase reporting of sensitive items among a variety of population subgroups. Design: A field test of A-CASI data collection conducted within an ongoing cross-sectional study of drug use and HIV risk behaviors among IDUs entering drug treatment. Participants were assigned without bias to either a computer-assisted interviewer-administered personal interview (CAPI) or to a mixed CAPI/A-CASI interview. In the latter, 'sensitive' portions (dealing with stigmatized behavior) of the questionnaire were self-administered through A-CASI, while the remaining portions were interviewer-administered. Setting: The Detoxification Program and the Methadone Maintenance Treatment Program (MMTP) at Beth Israel Medical Center in New York City. Participants: Seven hundred and eighty-three IDUs entering drug treatment. Measurements: Odds ratios and adjusted odds ratios (controlling for demographic differences) for comparison of A-CASI versus CAPI responses on 111 sensitive questions. Findings: Twenty-three statistically significant differences (each at P < 0.05), all in the direction of more reporting of the behaviors by the A-CASI group. Forty-one per cent of A-CASI participants said they would prefer any subsequent interviews to be fully A-CASI and 46% said they would prefer the mixed CAPI/A-CASI mode. Conclusions: A-CASI was associated with greater reporting of potentially stigmatized drug, sex and HIV risk behaviors on a moderate number of questions. Moreover, a large majority of participants who used A-CASI would like to be assigned to this method of data collection in future interviews.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)885-896
Number of pages12
Issue number7
StatePublished - Jul 2004


  • Computer-assisted
  • Drug use
  • Interview
  • Methodology
  • Self-report
  • Validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health


Dive into the research topics of 'Audio-computerized self-interviewing versus face-to-face interviewing for research data collection at drug abuse treatment programs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this