Abstract
In this rejoinder I briefly summarize my thoughts on appropriate measures of performance for evaluating change-point detection schemes, particularly the false alarm criterion. Then I address some specific issues in the light of the discussion pieces from eight experts in this field.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 414-419 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Sequential Analysis |
Volume | 27 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs |
|
State | Published - Oct 2008 |
Keywords
- Average run length
- CUSUM
- Expected false alarm rate
- Quantile run length
- Statistical process control
- Surveillance
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Statistics and Probability
- Modeling and Simulation