Autonomy on the horizon: comparing institutional approaches to disability and elder care

Guillermina Altomonte, Adrianna Bagnall Munson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


    This article asks how people come to interpret themselves and others as autonomous given their multiple dependencies. We draw on a cross-case comparison of ethnographic studies with two populations for whom autonomy is both central and problematic: elderly patients in post-acute care, and young adults with disabilities in an independent living program. Analyzing the institutional efforts to make their clients “as independent as possible,” we find that staff members at each organization formulate autonomy as a temporal project through an ongoing calibration of open futures, ideal pasts, and situational competence. Constantly adjusting and fine-tuning where in time autonomy “really” is, workers arrange present dependence so that the contours of the future remain open for their clients. In other words, they make use of temporal markers to produce recognizable autonomous subjects whose dependencies are momentary. Theorizing this temporal project enables us to see more clearly how all of us engage in the constant business of “doing” autonomy, and to better understand the role of institutions in producing autonomous selves.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)935-963
    Number of pages29
    JournalTheory and Society
    Issue number6
    StatePublished - Oct 2021


    • Agency
    • Aging
    • Autonomy
    • Disability
    • Independence
    • Temporality

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • History
    • Sociology and Political Science


    Dive into the research topics of 'Autonomy on the horizon: comparing institutional approaches to disability and elder care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this