TY - GEN
T1 - Beginning to Develop and Assess Engineering Judgment in an Introductory Geotechnical Engineering Course
AU - Carkin, Ryan
AU - Bennett, Victoria
AU - Zastavker, Yevgeniya V.
AU - Richtarek, Alyssa
AU - Harteveld, Casper
AU - Abdoun, Tarek
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). All rights reserved.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Geotechnical engineering requires the application of engineering judgment to successfully interpret field conditions and come to an appropriate decision. To practice engineering judgment, engineers evaluate their initial impressions when presented with new information and learn from past failures. This much is implicitly understood, but how engineers accrue engineering judgment is highly debated and is a research area still in its adolescence. Members of industry posit that engineering experience is essential for competent engineering practice, but traditional engineering education practices need to be updated with opportunities to acquire such experience. Internships help some students obtain relevant experience that entry-level engineers need. Unfortunately, not all students have the opportunity to experience hands-on internships, especially during the pandemic. Defining engineering judgment in the context of practicing engineering does not always map to a useful tool for educators to generate curricular designs that target development of this skill in the classroom. This prompted the need for a new paradigm regarding engineering judgment in undergraduate learning. Using a qualitative systematic review, we identified an emergent theoretical framework for engineering judgment that is comprised of seven emergent competencies. This paper presents the use of this emergent framework to design, implement, and assess a design project in a sophomore-level introductory geotechnical engineering course at a small private research institute in the Northeast of the United States. If we want students to learn the competencies included within engineering judgment, we need an explicit definition. If we want to support faculty as they respond to evolving ABET criteria, we need evidence of the use of these assessment tools for a range of student products. This paper presents the use of a research-based instructional strategy for utilizing student-centered goals, activities, products, and assessments (GAPA) aimed at developing engineering judgment in an undergraduate classroom.
AB - Geotechnical engineering requires the application of engineering judgment to successfully interpret field conditions and come to an appropriate decision. To practice engineering judgment, engineers evaluate their initial impressions when presented with new information and learn from past failures. This much is implicitly understood, but how engineers accrue engineering judgment is highly debated and is a research area still in its adolescence. Members of industry posit that engineering experience is essential for competent engineering practice, but traditional engineering education practices need to be updated with opportunities to acquire such experience. Internships help some students obtain relevant experience that entry-level engineers need. Unfortunately, not all students have the opportunity to experience hands-on internships, especially during the pandemic. Defining engineering judgment in the context of practicing engineering does not always map to a useful tool for educators to generate curricular designs that target development of this skill in the classroom. This prompted the need for a new paradigm regarding engineering judgment in undergraduate learning. Using a qualitative systematic review, we identified an emergent theoretical framework for engineering judgment that is comprised of seven emergent competencies. This paper presents the use of this emergent framework to design, implement, and assess a design project in a sophomore-level introductory geotechnical engineering course at a small private research institute in the Northeast of the United States. If we want students to learn the competencies included within engineering judgment, we need an explicit definition. If we want to support faculty as they respond to evolving ABET criteria, we need evidence of the use of these assessment tools for a range of student products. This paper presents the use of a research-based instructional strategy for utilizing student-centered goals, activities, products, and assessments (GAPA) aimed at developing engineering judgment in an undergraduate classroom.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85151658009&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85151658009&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1061/9780784484692.056
DO - 10.1061/9780784484692.056
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85151658009
T3 - Geotechnical Special Publication
SP - 554
EP - 562
BT - Geotechnical Special Publication
A2 - Rathje, Ellen
A2 - Montoya, Brina M.
A2 - Wayne, Mark H.
PB - American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
T2 - 2023 Geo-Congress: Sustainable Infrastructure Solutions from the Ground Up - Geotechnical Data Analysis and Computation
Y2 - 26 March 2023 through 29 March 2023
ER -