TY - JOUR
T1 - Believing in others
AU - Paul, Sarah K.
AU - Morton, Jennifer M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Many thanks to audiences at the University of Barcelona, the City College of New York, Northwestern University, the University of Illinois-Chicago, and the 2017 UNC-Chapel Hill Metaethics Workshop. Special thanks to Russ Shafer-Landau for suggesting the epigraph and to Mark Schroeder for written comments. This paper was made possible in part through the support of a grant from the John Templeton Foundation. The opinions expressed in the paper are our own and do not necessarily reflect the views of the John Templeton Foundation.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Philosophical Topics. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/3/1
Y1 - 2018/3/1
N2 - Suppose some person ‘A’ sets out to accomplish a difficult, long-term goal such as writing a passable PhD thesis. What should you believe about whether A will succeed? The default answer is that you should believe whatever the total accessible evidence concerning A’s abilities, circumstances, capacity for self-discipline, and so forth supports. But could it be that what you should believe depends in part on the relationship you have with A? We argue that it does, in the case where A is yourself. The capacity for “grit” involves a kind of epistemic resilience in the face of evidence suggesting that one might fail, and this makes it rational to respond to the relevant evidence differently when you are the agent in question. We then explore whether similar arguments extend to the case of “believing in” our significant others—our friends, lovers, family members, colleagues, patients, and students.
AB - Suppose some person ‘A’ sets out to accomplish a difficult, long-term goal such as writing a passable PhD thesis. What should you believe about whether A will succeed? The default answer is that you should believe whatever the total accessible evidence concerning A’s abilities, circumstances, capacity for self-discipline, and so forth supports. But could it be that what you should believe depends in part on the relationship you have with A? We argue that it does, in the case where A is yourself. The capacity for “grit” involves a kind of epistemic resilience in the face of evidence suggesting that one might fail, and this makes it rational to respond to the relevant evidence differently when you are the agent in question. We then explore whether similar arguments extend to the case of “believing in” our significant others—our friends, lovers, family members, colleagues, patients, and students.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051528232&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051528232&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5840/philtopics20184615
DO - 10.5840/philtopics20184615
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85051528232
SN - 0276-2080
VL - 46
SP - 75
EP - 95
JO - Philosophical Topics
JF - Philosophical Topics
IS - 1
ER -