TY - GEN
T1 - Best practices in e-Assessments with a special focus on cheating prevention
AU - Von Grunigen, Dirk
AU - De Azevedo E Souza, Fernando Benites
AU - Pradarelli, Beatrice
AU - Magid, Amani
AU - Cieliebak, Mark
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 IEEE.
PY - 2018/5/23
Y1 - 2018/5/23
N2 - In this digital age of the computer, Internet, and social media and Internet of Things, e-Assessments have become an accepted method to determine if students have learned materials presented in a course. With acceptance of this electronic means of assessing students, many questions arise about this method. What should be the format of e-Assessment? What amount of time? What kinds of questions should be asked (multiple choice, short answer, etc.)? These are only a few of the many different questions. In addition, educators have always had to contend with the possibility that some students might cheat on an examination. It is widely known that students are often times more technologically savvy than their professors. So how does one prevent students from cheating on an e-Assessment? Understandably, given the amount of information available on e-Assessments and the variety of formats to choose from, choosing to administer e-Assessments over paper-based assessments can lead to confusion on the part of the professor. This paper presents helpful guidance for lecturers who want to introduce e-Assessments in their class, and it provides recommendations about the technical infrastructure to implement to avoid students cheating. It is based on literature review, on an international survey that gathers insights and experiences from lecturers who are using e-Assessment in their class, and on technological evaluation of e-Assessment infrastructure.
AB - In this digital age of the computer, Internet, and social media and Internet of Things, e-Assessments have become an accepted method to determine if students have learned materials presented in a course. With acceptance of this electronic means of assessing students, many questions arise about this method. What should be the format of e-Assessment? What amount of time? What kinds of questions should be asked (multiple choice, short answer, etc.)? These are only a few of the many different questions. In addition, educators have always had to contend with the possibility that some students might cheat on an examination. It is widely known that students are often times more technologically savvy than their professors. So how does one prevent students from cheating on an e-Assessment? Understandably, given the amount of information available on e-Assessments and the variety of formats to choose from, choosing to administer e-Assessments over paper-based assessments can lead to confusion on the part of the professor. This paper presents helpful guidance for lecturers who want to introduce e-Assessments in their class, and it provides recommendations about the technical infrastructure to implement to avoid students cheating. It is based on literature review, on an international survey that gathers insights and experiences from lecturers who are using e-Assessment in their class, and on technological evaluation of e-Assessment infrastructure.
KW - Moodle
KW - cheating
KW - competencies
KW - e-Assessment
KW - evaluation
KW - grading
KW - technology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048106064&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048106064&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363325
DO - 10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363325
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85048106064
T3 - IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON
SP - 893
EP - 899
BT - Proceedings of 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference
PB - IEEE Computer Society
T2 - 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference - Emerging Trends and Challenges of Engineering Education, EDUCON 2018
Y2 - 17 April 2018 through 20 April 2018
ER -