TY - JOUR
T1 - Beyond cognitive dysfunction
T2 - Relevance of ecological validity of neuropsychological tests in multiple sclerosis
AU - Weber, Erica
AU - Goverover, Yael
AU - DeLuca, John
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), 2019.
PY - 2019/9/1
Y1 - 2019/9/1
N2 - In neurological diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS), a neuropsychological assessment is often requested to assist clinicians in evaluating the role of cognition in a patient’s level of everyday functioning. To be effective in this charge, it is assumed that performance on neuropsychological tests is related to how a person may function in everyday life, and the question is often asked: “Are neuropsychological tests ecologically valid?” In this review, we synthesize the literature that examines the use of neuropsychological tests to assess functioning across a variety of everyday functioning domains in MS (i.e. driving, employment, instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs)). However, we critically examine the usefulness of asking this broad question regarding ecological validity, given the psychometric and conceptual pitfalls it may yield. While many neuropsychological tests may be generally considered “ecologically valid” in MS, it is much more helpful to specify for whom, under what circumstances, and to what degree.
AB - In neurological diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS), a neuropsychological assessment is often requested to assist clinicians in evaluating the role of cognition in a patient’s level of everyday functioning. To be effective in this charge, it is assumed that performance on neuropsychological tests is related to how a person may function in everyday life, and the question is often asked: “Are neuropsychological tests ecologically valid?” In this review, we synthesize the literature that examines the use of neuropsychological tests to assess functioning across a variety of everyday functioning domains in MS (i.e. driving, employment, instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs)). However, we critically examine the usefulness of asking this broad question regarding ecological validity, given the psychometric and conceptual pitfalls it may yield. While many neuropsychological tests may be generally considered “ecologically valid” in MS, it is much more helpful to specify for whom, under what circumstances, and to what degree.
KW - Multiple sclerosis
KW - activities of daily living
KW - automobile driving
KW - employment
KW - neuropsychological tests
KW - psychometrics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072089155&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072089155&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1352458519860318
DO - 10.1177/1352458519860318
M3 - Article
C2 - 31469351
AN - SCOPUS:85072089155
SN - 1352-4585
VL - 25
SP - 1412
EP - 1419
JO - Multiple Sclerosis Journal
JF - Multiple Sclerosis Journal
IS - 10
ER -