TY - JOUR
T1 - Binary fate decisions in differentiating neurons
AU - Jukam, David
AU - Desplan, Claude
N1 - Funding Information:
We apologize to all whose work we inadvertently omitted. We would like to thank Robert Johnston and Daniel Vasiliauskas for helpful discussions and comments on the manuscript. David Jukam is supported by a New York University Dean's Dissertation Award. Claude Desplan is supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant R01 EY13012.
PY - 2010/2
Y1 - 2010/2
N2 - Neural cell fate programs must generate an enormous number of neurons with distinct adult functions. The decision to choose one neuronal subtype from two alternatives - a binary fate decision - is one way to diversify neuronal subtypes during nervous system development. Recent progress has been made in describing the genetic programs that define late-stage neuronal identity. Here, we review mechanisms that control how such fate decisions generate two different postmitotic, terminally differentiated neuronal subtypes. We survey examples from Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila that demonstrate different modes of binary neuronal fate specification that depend on cell division, lineage, stochastic gene expression, or extracellular signals. Comparison of these strategies reveals that, although organisms use diverse approaches to generate neural diversity, some common themes do exist.
AB - Neural cell fate programs must generate an enormous number of neurons with distinct adult functions. The decision to choose one neuronal subtype from two alternatives - a binary fate decision - is one way to diversify neuronal subtypes during nervous system development. Recent progress has been made in describing the genetic programs that define late-stage neuronal identity. Here, we review mechanisms that control how such fate decisions generate two different postmitotic, terminally differentiated neuronal subtypes. We survey examples from Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila that demonstrate different modes of binary neuronal fate specification that depend on cell division, lineage, stochastic gene expression, or extracellular signals. Comparison of these strategies reveals that, although organisms use diverse approaches to generate neural diversity, some common themes do exist.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=76749157251&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=76749157251&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.conb.2009.11.002
DO - 10.1016/j.conb.2009.11.002
M3 - Review article
C2 - 20022236
AN - SCOPUS:76749157251
SN - 0959-4388
VL - 20
SP - 6
EP - 13
JO - Current Opinion in Neurobiology
JF - Current Opinion in Neurobiology
IS - 1
ER -