TY - JOUR
T1 - Biomolecular modeling and simulation
T2 - A field coming of age
AU - Schlick, Tamar
AU - Collepardo-Guevara, Rosana
AU - Halvorsen, Leif Arthur
AU - Jung, Segun
AU - Xiao, Xia
PY - 2011/5
Y1 - 2011/5
N2 - We assess the progress in biomolecular modeling and simulation, focusing on structure prediction and dynamics, by presenting the field's history, metrics for its rise in popularity, early expressed expectations, and current significant applications. The increases in computational power combined with improvements in algorithms and force fields have led to considerable success, especially in protein folding, specificity of ligand/biomolecule interactions, and interpretation of complex experimental phenomena (e.g. NMR relaxation, protein-folding kinetics and multiple conformational states) through the generation of structural hypotheses and pathway mechanisms. Although far from a general automated tool, structure prediction is notable for proteins and RNA that preceded the experiment, especially by knowledge-based approaches. Thus, despite early unrealistic expectations and the realization that computer technology alone will not quickly bridge the gap between experimental and theoretical time frames, ongoing improvements to enhance the accuracy and scope of modeling and simulation are propelling the field onto a productive trajectory to become full partner with experiment and a field on its own right.
AB - We assess the progress in biomolecular modeling and simulation, focusing on structure prediction and dynamics, by presenting the field's history, metrics for its rise in popularity, early expressed expectations, and current significant applications. The increases in computational power combined with improvements in algorithms and force fields have led to considerable success, especially in protein folding, specificity of ligand/biomolecule interactions, and interpretation of complex experimental phenomena (e.g. NMR relaxation, protein-folding kinetics and multiple conformational states) through the generation of structural hypotheses and pathway mechanisms. Although far from a general automated tool, structure prediction is notable for proteins and RNA that preceded the experiment, especially by knowledge-based approaches. Thus, despite early unrealistic expectations and the realization that computer technology alone will not quickly bridge the gap between experimental and theoretical time frames, ongoing improvements to enhance the accuracy and scope of modeling and simulation are propelling the field onto a productive trajectory to become full partner with experiment and a field on its own right.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79956058665&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79956058665&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S0033583510000284
DO - 10.1017/S0033583510000284
M3 - Article
C2 - 21226976
AN - SCOPUS:79956058665
SN - 0033-5835
VL - 44
SP - 191
EP - 228
JO - Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics
JF - Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics
IS - 2
ER -