Biopolitical power and paradoxes in evaluation research with transnational migrant youth

Sophia Rodriguez, Jeremy Acree

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In this article, the authors theorize the practice of evaluation as linked to truth-telling and organizing future societies. Drawing on Foucauldian notions of biopolitical governmentality, the authors examine the origins of the field of evaluation, theorize it as a truth-telling practice that aims to control populations and futures, and consider the implications of this for a current evaluation project with transnational newcomer migrant youth in the United States. The authors raise the following questions about evaluation as a social practice: Who/what knowledge is produced in the process? What mechanisms/technologies are deployed to reason, compare, and quantify migrant youth experiences, and at what cost? What are the ethical imperatives underlying this truth-telling process? The article offers a productive critique of current evaluation practices, providing theoretical and methodological implications of this analysis, arguing to expose the politics of governance embedded in evaluation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)456-473
Number of pages18
JournalEvaluation
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2020

Keywords

  • biopolitics
  • ethics
  • evaluation as social practice
  • migrant youth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Development
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Biopolitical power and paradoxes in evaluation research with transnational migrant youth'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this