TY - JOUR
T1 - Blimp
T2 - The benchmark of linguistic minimal pairs for english
AU - Warstadt, Alex
AU - Parrish, Alicia
AU - Liu, Haokun
AU - Mohananey, Anhad
AU - Peng, Wei
AU - Wang, Sheng Fu
AU - Bowman, Samuel R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Association for Computational Linguistics.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - We introduce The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs (BLiMP),1 a challenge set for evaluating the linguistic knowledge of language models (LMs) on major grammatical phenomena in English. BLiMP consists of 67 individual datasets, each containing 1,000 minimal pairs—that is, pairs of minimally different sentences that contrast in grammatical acceptability and isolate specific phenomenon in syntax, morphology, or semantics. We generate the data according to linguist-crafted grammar templates, and human aggregate agreement with the labels is 96.4%. We evaluate n-gram, LSTM, and Transformer (GPT-2 and Transformer-XL) LMs by observing whether they assign a higher probability to the acceptable sentence in each minimal pair. We find that state-of-the-art models identify morphological contrasts related to agreement reliably, but they struggle with some subtle semantic and syntactic phenomena, such as negative polarity items and extraction islands.
AB - We introduce The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs (BLiMP),1 a challenge set for evaluating the linguistic knowledge of language models (LMs) on major grammatical phenomena in English. BLiMP consists of 67 individual datasets, each containing 1,000 minimal pairs—that is, pairs of minimally different sentences that contrast in grammatical acceptability and isolate specific phenomenon in syntax, morphology, or semantics. We generate the data according to linguist-crafted grammar templates, and human aggregate agreement with the labels is 96.4%. We evaluate n-gram, LSTM, and Transformer (GPT-2 and Transformer-XL) LMs by observing whether they assign a higher probability to the acceptable sentence in each minimal pair. We find that state-of-the-art models identify morphological contrasts related to agreement reliably, but they struggle with some subtle semantic and syntactic phenomena, such as negative polarity items and extraction islands.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097971734&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85097971734&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1162/tacl_a_00321
DO - 10.1162/tacl_a_00321
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85097971734
SN - 2307-387X
VL - 8
SP - 377
EP - 392
JO - Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
JF - Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
ER -