TY - JOUR
T1 - BMI and Healthcare Cost Impact of Eliminating Tax Subsidy for Advertising Unhealthy Food to Youth
AU - Sonneville, Kendrin R.
AU - Long, Michael W.
AU - Ward, Zachary J.
AU - Resch, Stephen C.
AU - Wang, Y. Claire
AU - Pomeranz, Jennifer L.
AU - Moodie, Marj L.
AU - Carter, Rob
AU - Sacks, Gary
AU - Swinburn, Boyd A.
AU - Gortmaker, Steven L.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported in part by grants from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (#66284), Donald and Sue Pritzker Nutrition and Fitness Initiative, JPB Foundation, National Collaborative on Childhood Obesity Research, and is a product of a Prevention Research Center supported by Cooperative Agreement U48/DP001946 from CDC, including the Nutrition and Obesity Policy Research and Evaluation Network. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position of CDC. The authors would like to thank the members of the Stakeholder Group for their contribution to the project.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 American Journal of Preventive Medicine.
PY - 2015/7/1
Y1 - 2015/7/1
N2 - Introduction: Food and beverage TV advertising contributes to childhood obesity. The current tax treatment of advertising as an ordinary business expense in the U.S. subsidizes marketing of nutritionally poor foods and beverages to children. This study models the effect of a national intervention that eliminates the tax subsidy of advertising nutritionally poor foods and beverages on TV to children aged 2-19 years. Methods: We adapted and modified the Assessing Cost Effectiveness framework and methods to create the Childhood Obesity Intervention Cost Effectiveness Study model to simulate the impact of the intervention over the 2015-2025 period for the U.S. population, including short-term effects on BMI and 10-year healthcare expenditures. We simulated uncertainty intervals (UIs) using probabilistic sensitivity analysis and discounted outcomes at 3% annually. Data were analyzed in 2014. Results: We estimated the intervention would reduce an aggregate 2.13 million (95% UI=0.83 million, 3.52 million) BMI units in the population and would cost $1.16 per BMI unit reduced (95% UI=$0.51, $2.63). From 2015 to 2025, the intervention would result in $352 million (95% UI=$138 million, $581 million) in healthcare cost savings and gain 4,538 (95% UI=1,752, 7,489) quality-adjusted life-years. Conclusions: Eliminating the tax subsidy of TV advertising costs for nutritionally poor foods and beverages advertised to children and adolescents would likely be a cost-saving strategy to reduce childhood obesity and related healthcare expenditures.
AB - Introduction: Food and beverage TV advertising contributes to childhood obesity. The current tax treatment of advertising as an ordinary business expense in the U.S. subsidizes marketing of nutritionally poor foods and beverages to children. This study models the effect of a national intervention that eliminates the tax subsidy of advertising nutritionally poor foods and beverages on TV to children aged 2-19 years. Methods: We adapted and modified the Assessing Cost Effectiveness framework and methods to create the Childhood Obesity Intervention Cost Effectiveness Study model to simulate the impact of the intervention over the 2015-2025 period for the U.S. population, including short-term effects on BMI and 10-year healthcare expenditures. We simulated uncertainty intervals (UIs) using probabilistic sensitivity analysis and discounted outcomes at 3% annually. Data were analyzed in 2014. Results: We estimated the intervention would reduce an aggregate 2.13 million (95% UI=0.83 million, 3.52 million) BMI units in the population and would cost $1.16 per BMI unit reduced (95% UI=$0.51, $2.63). From 2015 to 2025, the intervention would result in $352 million (95% UI=$138 million, $581 million) in healthcare cost savings and gain 4,538 (95% UI=1,752, 7,489) quality-adjusted life-years. Conclusions: Eliminating the tax subsidy of TV advertising costs for nutritionally poor foods and beverages advertised to children and adolescents would likely be a cost-saving strategy to reduce childhood obesity and related healthcare expenditures.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84932081590&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84932081590&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.02.026
DO - 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.02.026
M3 - Article
C2 - 26094233
AN - SCOPUS:84932081590
SN - 0749-3797
VL - 49
SP - 124
EP - 134
JO - American journal of preventive medicine
JF - American journal of preventive medicine
IS - 1
ER -